Dear Vaj, I appreciate your beef with the research but seems you're crossing a line of denigration here. Is one level to dismiss their research, is another to be a complete TM-denier. Is kind of like that thinking of holocaust deniers. Such haters, they'll deny anything about the holocaust, like Anne Frank never could have happened.
You deny TM with the (some) research. You deny and you take away their experience too just dismissing it. There is something not honest in going that far against a whole people. Whoa. Is not really yours to do. With Best Regards, -Doug in FF --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote: > > > > >> Such states are easily demonstrable by methods known for thousands of > >> years. So if the state is legit., it would be relatively easy to > >> know, > >> even without a lot of fancy science. What I've found is TMers > >> learn to > >> talk and think in flowery language as a part of the TM mythos and > >> that > >> ends up having little basis in reality, although they're quite > >> convinced what they're experiencing is something remarkable. > >> > >> Remarkable experiences require remarkable proof. So far no proof... > >> > > > > A word is a word. An experience is an experience. Both are different. > > - S. Shigematsu >
