> > I bet you $100 that Turq never hunted and > > killed an animal in his life, and then ate > > it. > > > > It's your claim, now prove it, or pay up. > > off_world_beings wrote: > You owe me 100 bucks Willytex. You lost the > bet. > What bet? It's your wager. I don't have to prove anything; all I have to do is demonstrate doubt in your claim - the burden of proof is on you, Sir.
So, you're saying that I lost the bet, but you didn't even show your money, you wouldn't show your proof, you tried to change the rules after you made the wager, and now you want to see my hand before you show yours, but I'm the cheater? Go figure. There's obviously no way you can prove your claim that "Turq never killed an animal for food in his life". You can't prove a negative, that's my point, so you should not bet money on anything unless you you can prove your point - only bet on a sure thing. I've asked at least ten respondents over the years how much they would be willing to wager, but you're the only informant that ever actually took me up on it. Now you have made yourself look like a stupid moron. Texas Hold 'Em Poker Rules: http://tinyurl.com/2xket > Cheater. > Ad hominem is the second to last resort of someone who is losing a debate and is unable to respond with legitimacy. The last resort (most difficult for the ego) is to consider that he might be wrong.
