Let me get back to you after your meeting with Dickens' three ghosts Bob. But if I run into Santa at the mall, I'll mention your request for an emotional punching bag this Christmas.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bob Price <bobpriced@...> wrote: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLb213lak5s > > > > Curtis, > > > So nice (I hope you don't mind being called nice; I can't think of a *word* > that better captures your posting voice) > to have you back posting on FFL, unless your post to RAVI was just a drive > by, we > were completely adrift without the steadying hand of your moral compass; I do > have one housekeeping item though, before we proceed; you and BUBBLES owe me > $3.18; that said, I'll let it ride---I now have $3.18 that says yours, > Bubbles, > and/or one of your ciphers, fingerprints, are all over the email that Rick > received, complaining about Ravi's choice of *words*. > > > Do I have this right; you figure Ravi's colorful and entertaining > communications should be stopped, > > at any cost, but anything Bubbles says is AOK in your book; is it me, or is > this a rerun? And it's > completely all right, in your book, to mock people behind their backs, as long > as we don't allow Ravi to do it to their faces----even when he was so > obviously > provoked. If nothing else, you've proven what a number of us have suspected, > for sometime now; that unlike Ravi, you're not cool---as in completely > un-cool. > In fact, lets not pussy (OMG, does that mean what I think it means) foot > around, you're actually a bit of a twerp, aren't you, and I doubt I'm the > first > to say so; I certainty wouldn't call you a hypocrite, you don't need any help > with that handle, and I know I have to be very careful with my choice of > *words* around you; we know how some *words* set you off (we'd hate to have to > post out again): "The Most Disgusting thing I ever read on FFL....". > But I would be remiss if I didn't point out your shameless attempt at > reconstruction by attempting to assassinate Ravi's character, while giving > your > Bubbles a free pass. Anybody with a brain knows you've been gunning for Ravi > because > he never bought into your class president shtick. And, of course, you've never > forgiven him for not taking your religious worship of your *POV* very > seriously: > My God, he called you a Buddhist, no less.  > > > I used to get a good chuckle at how easy it was to get you, Bubbles, and your > ciphers, to line up single file, to > avoid wasting ammo; I've now decided---watching the work of a real master like > Ravi, I need to get over myself: A bright flash, a loud ka-boom, building's > shake and stay standing (without so much as a broken window), and every > hypocrite on FFL is sent to kingdom-come by the neutron bomb, formally know as > Raja Ravi Yogi, the hunter-outster of the sociopathically dull---in all shapes > and sizes.  > > > I know you're the kind of guy that makes your mind up about *everything*, > before entering into a conversation > about *anything*, so you must be wondering who the hell Bubbles is. Well, let > me tell you how hard it's been trying to find just the right handle for your > buddy---I've lost count of the number we've tried; that fit, but not > perfectly; > till KB and the Vajette handed it to me as they continue "to do the same > thing over and over and expect different results"; the break through came > a couple of days ago when his KB-ness threatened to stop posting on FFL (as > if he > had somewhere else to go) and we discovered that what both he and the Vajette > seemed to be saying: > > > "I think it's very important to know when to stop". > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpDgRzzTE-I&feature=related > > > PS: Please let me know if you consider any of this bullying; I'm still > pondering that KOAN you shared with us that > bullying was impossible on FFL, but, at the same time, I was obviously > bullying > MZ, quite the paradox that one. BTW, how is your relationship with MZ going > these days, your dialogues are missed. The *nice* thing about the handle > *Bubbles* is it pretty much fits all > the hypocrites Ravi outs on a regular basis; most of them without even aiming, > the man is truly a wonder. And thank goodness, since binary makes granite > look mushy, > your attempt to slander Ravi, and your response to Judy---pointing out your > spelling mistake, and your "Most disgusting..." post to me will forever > weld you to your *Bubbles*, and your behavior of choice (starts with an h and > ends with an y). > > > PPS: Bubbles, be careful about twisting your neck into a pretzel pretending > you don't spend your life reading > everything posted on FFL; the chiropractor was right, you're not exactly a > spring chicken. I hadn't realized how much > > Willy was upsetting you with those photos of Rama, those Dutch people are > pretty tolerant, why don't you try > telling the waitress what's upsetting you so much. > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 3:08:28 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hey Ravi > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > From a casual lurker perspective, I was tempted to weigh in > > for the Ravi Alex gay bash video. I felt the intention was > > off my scale of acceptable. Ravi may have used his abrasiveness > > to bash someone for some higher purpose known only to himself > > in the past, but I sensed a shift toward using people as > > emotional punching bags in a way I do not appreciate.  > > Nice turn of phrase, Curtis. This "shift" is why > I have taken the approach of "tactical ignoring" > with a few people here. > > What I've noticed for some time is that there are > some people on this forum who not only feel that > they have the right to use the people whose ideas > they don't like as punching bags, they actually > seem to feel that their victims "owe it to them" > to punch back. > > I owe them nothing. Nada. Zip. Bupkus. They can > say anything about me they want, and chances are > (for the 6 people on my "written off as bad bets" > list) I'll never even see what they write. This seems > to piss them off no end, because what they seem > to want is for me to take what they write -- and > them -- seriously, and "get into it" with them, > in some head-to-head argument that they can then > imagine they "won." Not gonna happen. > > For the record, among the six folks I've thus > written off, some are for the reason I mentioned > yesterday -- I think they're mentally ill. I just > don't interact with the mentally ill; I have > neither the training nor the inclination to do > so. The others are just boring, and thus of no > interest. > > From my point of view, based on the increase of > Barry-bashing since I've adopted this stance, > ignoring them angers them and gets under their > skin more than anything else I could possibly do, > and that suits me just fine. :-) If they're so petty > that they feel they have to build their online lives > around "getting back at me" or "getting me," let > them live in that grudge mindset all they want. > I don't have to. As some smart church sign once said: > > > > > I believe in the freedom of using sexual material here in > > the form of celebrating that physical love between two > > consenting adults is one of the most beautiful, precious, > > wonderful, heart-healing, life-affirming, actual miracles... > > > > ...that money can buy. > > Good line, original or not. :-) > > Thanks for dropping in. Hope you feel like doing > so again, hopefully on more interesting topics. > > >                       >
