I know.  I saw that.  It doesn't look that way on my screen obviously.  Which 
is why I attempted to use the **ER start.  I'm not even sure my posts are 
coming through without the weird characters that show up here in the reply, for 
example.  40 characters?  Is there a button to push to know when that is or 
that counts characters?  I certainly can't be counting.  I am really a 
techno-dinosaur, so I welcome feedback.  



>________________________________
> From: richardatrwilliamsdotus <rich...@rwilliams.us>
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 5:51 PM
>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: SECOND Open [non-performance] Letter to Ravi 
>Chivukula
> 
>
>  
>
>
>Emily Reyn:
>> I tried my hand at interspersing my responses...
>> 
>Just a hint:
>
>Use > before what they say, and then post your 
>replies below that. That way, we can tell what 
>they say and your replies. (Try looking at Judy's 
>posts to get the formatting). 
>
>Use the ENTER key to break lines at 40 characters; 
>that makes your replies much easier to read, 
>instead of a mess like this: 
>
>> >> I'm sorry Barry. I may have this wrong...I thought I was 
>> >> referring to a conversation between you and Zarzari, not Vag. 
>> >> I can tell the difference between you and Vag 
>> >
>> >Vaj. Short for Vajranathra, his screen name. You don't 
>> >seem to be aware of the fact that by referring to him as 
>> >'Vag' you are perpetuating derogative namecalling started 
>> >by people who don't like him. That's fairly clueless of
>> >you IMO, especially in the context of criticizing someone
>> >else for the terms *they* use to describe people.
>> >**ER.  This was a complete mistake/mistype on my part...in my head, I was 
>> >hearing the word "vague"...probably subconsciously  influenced by Bob's 
>> >post - oh, oh, I see a diagnosis coming my way.  And, I totally didn't 
>> >even think of what Judy mentioned, in terms of relating the name to 
>> >"vagina."  That was a real shocker and particularly with regard to the 
>> >potential to "demean" women - not at all my intent, of course.  
>
><snip>
>
>
> 
>
>

Reply via email to