--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > EmilyBoo what does it mean when someone puts a word between > asterisks?
Any reasonably intelligent person who's been reading posts for years, as Share has, will have picked up what asterisks mean. And Emily's was a particularly straightforward use thereof: "It is *your* question, honey." Share didn't like that, and her disingenuous question was intended to convey her hostility (as was the rest of this post, and the post to Emily before this one), as well as her intention to refuse to take responsibility for what she had said in in her Nov. 11 post that Emily was asking her about.  I've been wondering this for a long time but it hasn't seemed truly pertinent til now. And it sounds like you feel entitled to a simple yes or no answer because you have spent SO many posts on me this week. OTOH, you say that I am healing your karma. See how it all balances out all by itself (-: > > BTW, speaking of stress, don't listen to those TM teachers! You can be > totally unstressing and still be making a valid point. Like when they fed > us millet at every meal. Of course people were unstressing on that! Only > a totally zorbed out person wouldn't! The point is, the unstressors were > making a very valid, uh, point. What's a good synonym for the word point do > you think? > > > Anyway, what was the question, what was the question...oh, yes wts. > Completely healed. November 11th. Yes or no. Asterisks. Honey. > > You know, Ravi did not sound like himself at all today. I did wonder if HE > might be completely healed. Either that or he has been totally assimilated > by the BORG. Buttery Omnivorous Robin Group. > > Which is perfect just as it is. Warts and all. As is wts. As is FFL > High School football lunch table in the cafeteria gang. > > PS Your answer is in the first two sentences just above. You did say I > could answer with more than yes or no. Remember? > > > ________________________________ > From: emilymae.reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:17 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: to Emily part 2 > > >  > Sharester, "Do you think there has been complete healing of wts since > November 11th?" Yes or No. It is *your* question, honey. No rabbit hole, > just a simple yes or no will do for me. Now, I have spent many posts this > week on you - you are healing my karma. I must back off of my propensity to > comment or I will post out again, and I'm not in the mood to do that this > week. I wish you a stress-free day. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > There was a post from wts via Ravi this morning! So based on that, I'd > > say wts is alive and kicking. Or maybe zorbing. Anyway, something > > relevant: when the karma is finished, the cure appears. Another > > version: when the karma is finished, the healer appears. Came to mind > > as I've been thinking about complete healing. Which seems related to your > > wts questions to me. It seems that another way to ask those wts questions > > is: do I think there has been complete healing of wts since Nov 11. > > Uhoh, still a rabbit hole as Richard would say. Still FFL waters that can > > be muddied way too quickly. Anyway, maybe someone is completely healed. > > Time will tell. > > > > Oh, I didn't think you were contesting anything I said. And thanks, I got > > it about your not disagreeing with Judy or Raunchy. And yes, there's > > always another way to look at everything. > > >
