Passive Aggressive Lessons for Share http://youtu.be/gDzoVtts3qU
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > EmilyBoo what does it mean when someone puts a word between > > asterisks? > > Any reasonably intelligent person who's been reading posts > for years, as Share has, will have picked up what asterisks > mean. And Emily's was a particularly straightforward use > thereof: "It is *your* question, honey." > > Share didn't like that, and her disingenuous question was > intended to convey her hostility (as was the rest of this > post, and the post to Emily before this one), as well as > her intention to refuse to take responsibility for what > she had said in in her Nov. 11 post that Emily was asking > her about. > > > > > > >  I've been wondering this for a long time but it hasn't seemed truly > pertinent til now. And it sounds like you feel entitled to a simple yes or > no answer because you have spent SO many posts on me this week. OTOH, you > say that I am healing your karma. See how it all balances out all by itself > (-: > > > > BTW, speaking of stress, don't listen to those TM teachers! You can be > > totally unstressing and still be making a valid point. Like when they fed > > us millet at every meal. Of course people were unstressing on that! > > Only a totally zorbed out person wouldn't! The point is, the unstressors > > were making a very valid, uh, point. What's a good synonym for the word > > point do you think? > > > > > > Anyway, what was the question, what was the question...oh, yes wts. > > Completely healed. November 11th. Yes or no. Asterisks. Honey. > > > > You know, Ravi did not sound like himself at all today. I did wonder if > > HE might be completely healed. Either that or he has been totally > > assimilated by the BORG. Buttery Omnivorous Robin Group. > > > > Which is perfect just as it is. Warts and all. As is wts. As is FFL > > High School football lunch table in the cafeteria gang. > > > > PS Your answer is in the first two sentences just above. You did say I > > could answer with more than yes or no. Remember? > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: emilymae.reyn <emilymae.reyn@> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:17 AM > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: to Emily part 2 > > > > > >  > > Sharester, "Do you think there has been complete healing of wts since > > November 11th?" Yes or No. It is *your* question, honey. No rabbit hole, > > just a simple yes or no will do for me. Now, I have spent many posts this > > week on you - you are healing my karma. I must back off of my propensity > > to comment or I will post out again, and I'm not in the mood to do that > > this week. I wish you a stress-free day. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > There was a post from wts via Ravi this morning! So based on that, I'd > > > say wts is alive and kicking. Or maybe zorbing. Anyway, something > > > relevant: when the karma is finished, the cure appears. Another > > > version: when the karma is finished, the healer appears. Came to mind > > > as I've been thinking about complete healing. Which seems related to > > > your wts questions to me. It seems that another way to ask those wts > > > questions is: do I think there has been complete healing of wts since > > > Nov 11. Uhoh, still a rabbit hole as Richard would say. Still FFL > > > waters that can be muddied way too quickly. Anyway, maybe someone is > > > completely healed. Time will tell. > > > > > > Oh, I didn't think you were contesting anything I said. And thanks, I > > > got it about your not disagreeing with Judy or Raunchy. And yes, > > > there's always another way to look at everything. > > > > > >
