http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MmNkwPtwfA&feature=related --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <lurkernomore20002000@...> wrote: > > Hi Gang, > I just tuned in for a moment, and I haven't read what came before this, > or whats come after. > But this is one of the funniest posts I have read in a long time. > Share, I gotta say that at this point I am feeling very sorry for those > guys, (and gals) at Batgap. We purloined their best talent. > I mean, if that whole group were a Pokemon card, it would be have to be > Snorelax. And if you were a Pokemon card, Share, it would be Pikachu, > the most beloved of all the Pokemons. > Emily, remember when you derived so much joy from the Judy/Robin > exchange a long time back. I couldn't relate. But the humor in that > exchange was so evident to you. > I hope you can appreciate the marvelous humor Share is employing here. > Kudos Share! > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> > wrote: > > > > EmilyBoo what does it mean when someone puts a word between > asterisks? I've been wondering this for a long time but it hasn't > seemed truly pertinent til now. And it sounds like you feel > entitled to a simple yes or no answer because you have spent SO many > posts on me this week. OTOH, you say that I am healing your > karma. See how it all balances out all by itself (-: > > > > BTW, speaking of stress, don't listen to those TM teachers! You > can be totally unstressing and still be making a valid point. Like > when they fed us millet at every meal. Of course people were > unstressing on that! Only a totally zorbed out person wouldn't! > The point is, the unstressors were making a very valid, uh, point. > What's a good synonym for the word point do you think? > > > > > > Anyway, what was the question, what was the question...oh, yes > wts. Completely healed. November 11th. Yes or no. > Asterisks. Honey. > > > > You know, Ravi did not sound like himself at all today. I did > wonder if HE might be completely healed. Either that or he has been > totally assimilated by the BORG. Buttery Omnivorous Robin Group. > > > > Which is perfect just as it is. Warts and all. As is > wts. As is FFL High School football lunch table in the cafeteria > gang. > > > > PS Your answer is in the first two sentences just above. You > did say I could answer with more than yes or no. Remember? > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: emilymae.reyn emilymae.reyn@ > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:17 AM > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: to Emily part 2 > > > > > >  > > Sharester, "Do you think there has been complete healing of wts since > November 11th?" Yes or No. It is *your* question, honey. No rabbit > hole, just a simple yes or no will do for me. Now, I have spent many > posts this week on you - you are healing my karma. I must back off of > my propensity to comment or I will post out again, and I'm not in the > mood to do that this week. I wish you a stress-free day. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: > > > > > > There was a post from wts via Ravi this morning! So based on > that, I'd say wts is alive and kicking. Or maybe zorbing. > Anyway, something relevant: when the karma is finished, the cure > appears. Another version: when the karma is finished, the > healer appears. Came to mind as I've been thinking about complete > healing. Which seems related to your wts questions to me. It > seems that another way to ask those wts questions is: do I think > there has been complete healing of wts since Nov 11. Uhoh, still a > rabbit hole as Richard would say. Still FFL waters that can be > muddied way too quickly. Anyway, maybe someone is completely > healed. Time will tell. > > > > > > Oh, I didn't think you were contesting anything I said. And > thanks, I got it about your not disagreeing with Judy or Raunchy. > And yes, there's always another way to look at everything. > > > > > >