And I don't think it really matters if you think of it as one part with 4 voices or 4 parts that are in sync with each other.
I think of such a passage as 4 parts in sync with each other, but I'm not sure why how it is thought of would make a difference in the discussion.
Philip Aker wrote:
On Wednesday, Dec 31, 2003, at 12:15 US/Pacific, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
I often write for big band, and homophonic sections are easily entered by holding down big fat 4 or 5 part chords on the MIDI keyboard with one hand while entering the note value with the other, on the first trumpet part for example, then Exploding it to the other trumpet staves.
As a matter of clarification, and not to disagree with your other remarks on Finale's Explode, I would characterize anything with such lock-step rhythm and (presumably) continuously parallel motions as being conceptually one "part". Like in a 4 part piece, it would be one part ("homophonic sections" and "first trumpet part" notwithstanding) and the various trumpets being the "voices" of the part. Agree or disagree?
Philip Aker http://www.aker.ca
_______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
.
-- David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
