Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 01:39 PM 7/16/2008, Chuck Israels wrote:
>I am another committed Speedy Entry user who has attempted using
>Simple Entry a few times and quickly abandoned it. Tom Johnson told me
>a couple of years ago that the long term plan was to make Simple have
>an option that would allow pitch first, then duration - the way Speedy
>works.
For my money, this is absolutely crucial. Every time I try Simple, I get
hung up on having to think duration and then pitch. It's not the way I
think with pen and paper (I move to the right place on the staff and
then draw a note of a certain duration), so why would it be the way I
think in software?
Because it's easier if we don't burden the developers with our desires
for things to work as we do?
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
