When you think about all the hoops you have to jump thru with measure
numbers, cues, clef changes, etc, does anyone really believe it is
quicker to do all that than make the occasional revision twice in two
different files?
The I way work it isn't even close. Two files is far less work and more
reliable. Especially given that any major revisions still require page
layout rework in each part, no matter if the parts share the same file
as the score or have their own.
And this not to mention all the critical features that cannot be
different in score and part that yet must be: special tool adjustments
and hairpin widths are the two most obvious.
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
but for the publication
stage I always have two files.
--
Robert Patterson
http://RobertGPatterson.com
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
