Pep Ribal wrote: > I think the best way to proceed, after reading your posts, is to focus > on this solution: a different (open) protocol for FlightGear inside > IVAO servers. So what I'd ask you is a set of reasons why we should go > for this solution and forget the INL: techical reasons > (security-related above all), license reasons, etc. Please help me > prepare an interesting proposal. > > I'm aware the worst hurdle to overcome will be this agreement between > two communities with different points of view, but if we could address > this specific issue successfully, I'm sure the outcome would be very > interesting for the community in general.
If this approach ends up in a secure, open sourced protocol being available for IVAO then they/you would also gain since you will end up with a protocol which you know is secure, instead of a protocol of which you hope it is secure as long as nobody knows how it works. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
