At 8:11 PM +0000 12/12/02, Keith Hudson wrote:
It will take more than a few years for private schools to undo the damage
of over a century of state education in England and America
Hi Keith,
How do you square that with this BBC news item?


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/2552523.stm

Dec. 7, 2002

Fee-paying pupils 'gain worst degrees'

Private pupils have less chance of getting a first

The UK's most expensive private schools are producing pupils who achieve the
worst grades at university, according to research.

An eight-year study of graduates' results by researchers at the University
of Warwick suggests that the more parents pay in school fees, the less
chance their children have of getting a good degree.

They believe this is due to the fact that A-level results are a product of
both potential ability and coaching - the better the coaching, the lower the
natural ability a student needs to get the A-level grades necessary to gain
a university place.

However, once at university, potential ability becomes more important and
the boost provided by the independent schools' coaching does not continue.

The research was revealed to the BBC's Newsnight programme days before head
teachers from independent schools are set to express their concerns about
universities' admissions policies.

They will meet Higher Education Minister Margaret Hodge on Monday to discuss
what they feel is discrimination against their pupils as a result of the
government's "widening participation" policy.

Dr Robin Naylor and Dr Jeremy Smith of Warwick University's Department of
Economics analysed data from the Universities Statistical Records, covering
every student at a UK university from 1985 until 1993.

They found that a student from an independent school has an 8% lower chance
of getting a first or an upper second degree than a state school pupil who
enters university with the same A-level grades.

Coaching

Further analysis of data relating to the 1993 graduates also revealed a
correlation between this effect and the level of fees a school charges.

Dr Smith told Newsnight they had found a great deal of variation around the
type of independent school pupils attended.

"We found that the students - the independent school students - who were the
least successful in fact went to the highest fee-paying schools," he said.

"So in fact I think the headline figure we got from that was roughly if you
pay an extra £5,000 at an independent school, you are around 4% less likely
to get a good degree, for every extra £5,000."

Dr Naylor believes that it is therefore "not inappropriate" for a
university's admissions policy to take account of an applicant's school
background as well as their A-level performance.

'Cheap shot'

Dick Davison, of the Independent Schools Council told The Times newspaper
that it was "silly" to relate fee scales to degree performance because
cheaper day schools were often highly selective.

He said the most expensive boarding schools charged for a variety of
services unrelated to academic performance.

"I think it is a bit of a cheap shot," he said.

"I think that the universities are rather less keen to accept that pupils
find the teaching in many universities to be poorer than that which they
enjoyed at school."



As for the rest of your post, Keith, I'll need more time to respond. My USA Edison piece that I have just sent to Harry is an example of for profit 'education' corporations. What I really want to do is find time to expose what Ms Thatcher started that led to:


At 4:00 PM -0500 12/12/02, Keith wrote:
more teacher are retiring
prematurely from state schools, student teachers, once they've sampled
teaching practice in a real school in their last few months, are
increasingly deciding not to go into teaching when they've graduated (30%
this year), and many schools are now relying on temporary staff and foreign
recruitment for considerable proportions of their staff.
Mike Harris in Ontario copied her 'play book' for the last seven years and we are now seeing what you described above.

Take care,
Brian




Hi Brian,

It will take more than a few years for private schools to undo the damage
of over a century of state education in England and America. In fact, I
wonder sometimes whether any future government in these two countries will
ever have the courage to give private schools full scope, or give parents
vouchers to the full value of the present per capita costs of the state
system.

The present Labour government in England has been throwing huge aliquots of
money at the education system for the past five years -- as befits a prime
minister who said, on taking government, that the chief policy aims of his
government were "Education, Education, Education".

However, literacy and numeracy achievements continue to slide, truancy
rates go up (10% now overall), violent attacks by pupils and parents on
teachers are rising (over 80,000 last year), maths, science and engineering
are hardly being taught at all in many schools, more teacher are retiring
prematurely from state schools, student teachers, once they've sampled
teaching practice in a real school in their last few months, are
increasingly deciding not to go into teaching when they've graduated (30%
this year), and many schools are now relying on temporary staff and foreign
recruitment for considerable proportions of their staff. The only
reasonably good secondary schools are in the leafy suburbs with children
who are parent-motivated and these schools are becoming a shrinking
minority. Even some of these can't attract sufficient numbers of teachers
in maths and the sciences.

Maybe you'll be able to preserve a reasonably good school system in Canada,
but the signs are from America, England and increasingly from France,
Germany, Japan and other countries in the developed world that the state
education systems are failing badly to motivate and teach more than about
30% of their children and teenagers reasonably effectively. The rest are
either becoming becoming deeply alienated from the school system or are
playing along in order to get to into increasingly dumbed-down universities
where at least they can have good social lives. (But -- I forgot to mention
-- the fall-out rate from even the inferior universities is rising -- 40%
in many cases in this country.)

If you can escape all that -- fine -- and I wish you all the best. But the
chances are (I guess) that you won't escape. What are needed are totally
new systems and methods of teaching. We are becoming an increasingly
specialised society and we need an increasingly wide diversity of schools.
The latter can never come about from schools that are subservient to state
bureaucracies and teacher unions with fixed ideas and methodologies, only
from private enterprises which have to be closer to real life or they don't
survive.

Keith

 At 06:46 12/12/02 -0500, you wrote:
Hi Keith,
"Crumble and despair" has been creeping into public education in many
countries. But don't despair, simply look west young man and see what
the paragon of wisdom, truth, virtue and free trade is doing. America
the beautiful has private corporations like Edison running more and more
school systems. They will cut all the fat, contract out all secretaries,
caretakers(minimum wage of course) bust all evil teacher unions, use MBA
managers rather than principals (head teachers)and tax payers will be
happy. Scores on standardized tests(developed by other private
corporations) will go up as teaching to the test will become the
official curriculum.
Margaret Thatcher will have accomplished her dream that she set into
motion when she was Minister of Education and the entire world will be
ever so more efficient.

Take care,
Brian

 Charles Clarke, the present Minister for Education, is seriously
 proposing
 that head-teachers should have the power to fine parents whose
 children are
 skipping school.

 The proposal has only just been released this morning. It will, of
 course,
 die a death almost immediately because it's more than a step towards
 >> the
 sort of totalitarianism of Communist USSR or Nazi Germany but,
 nevertheless, it's yet another indication of the depth of despair that
 politicians in the present Labour government have about the
 fast-crumbling
 state education system in England.

 Keith Hudson
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------

Keith Hudson, General Editor, Handlo Music, http://www.handlo.com
6 Upper Camden Place, Bath BA1 5HX, England
Tel: +44 1225 312622;  Fax: +44 1225 447727; mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
________________________________________________________________________

--
**************************************************
*  Brian McAndrews, Practicum Coordinator        *
*  Faculty of Education, Queen's University      *
*  Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6                     *
*  FAX:(613) 533-6596  Phone (613) 533-6000x74937*
*  e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]            *
*  "Education is not the filling of a pail,      *
*   but the lighting of a fire.                  *
*                 W.B.Yeats                      *
*                                                *
**************************************************

Reply via email to