On Saturday 17 March 2007 21:54, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > On 3/17/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No community -> no releases ??
> Here the scenario is a project with all committers from one employer > and regular releases. Sorry, I don't fully follow. I thought you were speaking "in general", and your comment to Ant Elder seems to still suggest that, so what do you mean "scenario"? Irregardless of that, the IPMC could stipulate that releases are "final stepping stones" towards graduation, and require an active and diverse community to allow for releases. After all, it is the Incubator that does the release (legally) and not the podling. Personally, I think it makes sense. I could also see good argument to allow for one or two 'early releases' which don't require this. SO the setup is a huge deterrent to "get cozy in the Incubator", not too different from the human incubator, where the baby will try to stay on, and the mother's body will starve it of the resources to force a birth.... ;o) Cheers Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
