On Wednesday, 22 June 2016 13:02:20 UTC+3, andrew...@gmail.com wrote: > > >> You are not bringing anything new to the table here, except the attempt > to insult my intelligence, apparently. >> >> > I do not have any claims to anyone personally. > I only defend my own point of view. > > P.S. > > Also I don't love to see or use some (not my own) code which written like > a mess. > If I cannot understand some code then this does not means that this code > is bad. > > But if I know that a some code has been written carelessly and can be > written more diligently then it gives me a negative reaction on that work > (if there was no reason to write it carelessly). > > That is, write code once and and use it everywhere. > Or more precisely, write (high quality and reusable) code once and and use > it everywhere (and give the possibility to use it to everyone). > > The generics programming are very good suit for that. > > In the simplest definition, *generic programming* is a style of computer > programming <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_programming> in which > algorithms are written in terms of types *to-be-specified-later* that are > then *instantiated* when needed for specific types provided as parameters > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parameter_(computer_programming)>. > > The term *generic programming *describes a programming paradigm whereby > fundamental requirements on types are abstracted from across concrete > examples of algorithms and data structures and formalised as concepts, with > generic functions implemented in terms of these concepts, typically using > language genericity mechanisms as described above. > > P.S. > > I am sorry but here we discuss mostly about the advantages and > disadvantages of the generic programming (of course, in Go language). >
Are there any points missing in the summary? This thread was a about a specific proposal, but as usual with threads they diverge from the original topic. > Here we do not discuss: How to coding in Go language without generic > programming. > I think that it should be different topic with appropriate title. > The version without generics is necessary to compare how well a particular generics approach improves the current language and code. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
