guix-devel  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Automating package updates Greg Hogan
  • Re: Automating package updates Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Automating package updates Andreas Enge
  • Re: Automating package updates Giacomo Leidi
  • Re: Automating package updates Greg Hogan
  • Re: Automating package updates Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Automating package updates Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • wording of rule 1? (was Re: Automating package updates) Simon Tournier
  • Re: wording of rule 1? (was Re: Automating package updates) Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: wording of rule 1? (was Re: Automating package updates) Ludovic Courtès
  • off topic Re: wording of rule 1? (was Re: Automating package updates) Simon Tournier
  • Re: Automating package updates Simon Tournier
  • Re: Automating package updates Andreas Enge
  • Re: Automating package updates Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Automating package updates Simon Tournier
  • Re: Automating package updates Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Automating package updates Trevor Arjeski
  • Re: Carbon footprint, “AI”, and Guix Brendan Tildesley
  • Re: Carbon footprint, “AI”, and Guix λx . x
  • Re: Carbon footprint, “AI”, and Guix Steve George
  • Re: Carbon footprint, “AI”, and Guix λx . x
  • Re: Carbon footprint, “AI”, and Guix Steve George
  • Re: Carbon footprint, “AI”, and Guix Cayetano Santos
  • Re: Carbon footprint, “AI”, and Guix Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting” Simon Tournier
  • AI translations (was Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting”) pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: AI translations (was Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting”) Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: AI translations (was Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting”) pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Should we use Weblate or Translation Project (was Re: AI translations (was Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting”) pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Should we use Weblate or Translation Project (was Re: AI translations (was Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting”) Julien Lepiller
  • Re: Should we use Weblate or Translation Project (was Re: AI translations (was Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting”) pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Should we use Weblate or Translation Project (was Re: AI translations (was Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting”) Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Should we use Weblate or Translation Project (was Re: AI translations (was Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting”) Andrei Șova
  • Re: Should we use Weblate or Translation Project (was Re: AI translations (was Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting”) pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: AI translations (was Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting”) Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting” bon
  • Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting” Peter Polidoro
  • Re: Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting” Cayetano Santos
• About Redis in GNU Artanis Nala Ginrut
  • Re: About Redis in GNU Artanis Nala Ginrut
  • Re: About Redis in GNU Artanis Nala Ginrut
• installing guix system 1.5.0 info . borisu
  • Re: installing guix system 1.5.0 Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: installing guix system 1.5.0 Attila Lendvai
  • Re: installing guix system 1.5.0 jbranso
• Deprecation Policy for packages with multiple variants Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Deprecation Policy for packages with multiple variants Andreas Enge
• Bayfront downtime Andreas Enge
  • Re: Bayfront downtime Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Bayfront downtime Andreas Enge
  • Re: Bayfront downtime Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Bayfront downtime Andreas Enge
• Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Vagrant Cascadian
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Anderson Torres
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Vagrant Cascadian
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Kaelyn
  • ncurses updates (Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch) Vagrant Cascadian
  • Re: ncurses updates (Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch) Noé Lopez
  • Re: ncurses updates (Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch) Vagrant Cascadian
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Ashish SHUKLA
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch pinoaffe
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Noé Lopez
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Noé Lopez
  • Re: [bug#80782] Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: [bug#80782] Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Kaelyn
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch André Batista
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Sughosha
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Julien Lepiller
  • Re: [bug#80782] Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Nicolas Goaziou
  • Re: Final call for misc-world-rebuild branch Ada Stevenson
• Painful patch tests (with system images) and/or guix system usage. Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
  • Re: Painful patch tests (with system images) and/or guix system usage. Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
  • Re: guix-cuirass-bot to run (system) tests for certain package updates Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
• Re: GCD007: call for deliberation Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
• local privilege escalation vulnearabilities affecting linux-libre (copy.fail and dirty frag) Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: local privilege escalation vulnearabilities affecting linux-libre (copy.fail and dirty frag) pinoaffe
  • Re: local privilege escalation vulnearabilities affecting linux-libre (copy.fail and dirty frag) Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
• Qt6 6.10 update? Sughosha
  • Re: Qt6 6.10 update? Andreas Enge
  • Re: Qt6 6.10 update? Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Qt6 6.10 update? Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Qt6 6.10 update? Sughosha
• [fr] Moment de convivialité Guix@Paris en mai Tanguy Le Carrour
  • Re: [fr] Moment de convivialité Guix@Paris en mai Tanguy Le Carrour
• Result of GCD 006 "Package deprecation": Accepted! Andreas Enge
• No more double LUKS passphrase entry Ian Eure
  • Re: No more double LUKS passphrase entry Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: No more double LUKS passphrase entry Vivien Kraus
  • Re: No more double LUKS passphrase entry Fredrik Salomonsson
• Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Untrusem
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Vagrant Cascadian
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pinoaffe
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Vagrant Cascadian
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Thanos Apollo
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Ian Eure
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Thanos Apollo
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Ian Eure
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Thanos Apollo
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not André Batista
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Thanos Apollo
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not André Batista
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pinoaffe
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not André Batista
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: [GCD 008]: LLM and copyright infringments Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: [GCD 008]: LLM and copyright infringments Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Ian Eure
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Andreas Enge
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not bokr
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Divya Ranjan Pattanaik
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Ian Eure
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Ian Eure
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Ian Eure
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Ian Eure
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Ian Eure
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Noé Lopez
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Yarl
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Greg Hogan
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Tomas Volf
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Greg Hogan
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Greg Hogan
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Greg Hogan
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Pjotr Prins
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pinoaffe
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Kristoffer Ström
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Vagrant Cascadian
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
• Re: Deliberation of GCD 006 Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
  • Re: Deliberation of GCD 006 Andreas Enge
  • Re: Deliberation of GCD 006 Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
  • Re: Deliberation of GCD 006 Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Deliberation of GCD 006 Peter Polidoro
  • Re: Deliberation of GCD 006 宋文武
  • Re: Deliberation of GCD 006 Andreas Enge
• Confusion about guile versions; which one should I use? Tomas Volf
  • Re: Confusion about guile versions; which one should I use? Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Confusion about guile versions; which one should I use? Tomas Volf
• One bug per day... Andreas Enge
  • Re: One bug per day... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: One bug per day... Andreas Enge
• [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Simon Tournier
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Greg Hogan
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Noé Lopez
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Greg Hogan
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Vagrant Cascadian
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Greg Hogan
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Simon Tournier
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Greg Hogan
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Gabriel Wicki
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Andreas Enge
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Noé Lopez
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Laurent Gatto
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Giacomo Leidi

• Earlier messages
• Later messages