Hello Ally, 

This is indeed an area you can help with. Look around for a project, and when 
you find one to your liking get in touch with them and find out where you can 
help out. As you pointed out, docs are always an issue. No viable project will 
ignore offers for help. 

It could be worth your while to check out the Samba wiki. Ok, it's fully up to 
date, but hardly concise. Maybe you can help out? 

-- 
Regards,
Jan Henkins

Ally Biggs <bluechr...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

Gotta give Microsoft kudos where it's due, setting up active directory, group 
policies and domain functionality is a walk in the park compared to Linux. 
someone really needs to write a plain English guide on how to deploy and 
integrate Linux in a windows environment. The documentation needs to be clear, 
concise, updated and work on numerous popular Linux distros such as Debian or 
Redhat. Sure there are numerous guides and distros like Sme server and tools 
like webmin to make the setting up and administration side less painful but 
when things go wrong and your left staring at a config file or a terminal 
window thinking wtf do I do now? Then things can be a pain in the ass unless 
you are a Linux god or can afford to get a Linux consultant which is a 
additional expense and could be avoided if you deployed server 2k8 r2 :) 


Sent from my iPhone


On 8 Apr 2012, at 23:01, "Bryn Jones" <hants...@http-420.co.uk> wrote:

Oh yeah its all theory but things like SME server says it's not only doable but 
comes in  a box at times. It also has to be 100% supportable by me ar anyone 
with enough knowledge. Walking into a network to troubleshoot someones insane 
one off implementation of something really mad and obscure has been part of my 
life for a long time :) (is it wrong I enjoy it though?)

It's not "core" to their needs they can bimble along..... As a "consultant" I 
think it will improve their lives a bit, authentication is not the main reason 
I'm moving them to more server side stuff (backups, firewalls yada yada)..... I 
just wrote a huge recommendations doc mainly full of neat lil tweaks they can 
do to make life easier on their own. 

I am aware that Windows AD is simple, it also costs. When budget=£0 (or around 
that) then a bit of creativity goes a long way......

On 08/04/12 22:42, Ian Grody wrote: 

With all due respect, LDAP is nice and all and is quite versatile and useful 
etc etc etc.

However, as much I am a hardcore BSD/Linux user, m$ active directory excretes 
all over LDAP many, many fold, as hard as it is for me to admit this. I wont go 
into all the technicals, using Linux for LDAP in a Win domain would be a fun 
project and something to "try out" - But, I would be somewhat weary of relying 
on it unless you know exactly what you are getting yourself into.

On the other hand, new users to Linux coming from win benefit in many ways...

Examples: Be offline when testing;

Install a webcam on both Windows & Linux and time how long it takes before you 
get to see a live picture from it.

Do the same with any USB storage device & time how long it takes to be able to 
read or write to the device.

Do the same for a usb bluetooth or wifi device.

Do the same for a mass majority of hardware & you will notice win has to go 
online almost each time to obtain a driver. Most times out of 10, Linux already 
has one and works out of the box.

Now, doing something like using Linux as an AD for Win domain, takes a lot of 
time, effort & work. It is highly doable and yes, there are lots of documents. 
But, what happens if it breaks and you are not about..!?

As I say, be fun to try as a project....


Ian



On 08/04/2012 17:42, Tony Wood wrote: 

+1 to Ally's remarks.
As a relative newcomer to Linux, I was at first somewhat put off by the 
quick-fire geekiness I saw in these mailing lists.
I'm glad now that I persisted and am amazed at the difference now that I and my 
wife have gone 100% Linux: FAR less hassle; fewer clicks to do what we want; 
and the support from other users is the stuff of dreams. 
Even Terminal is becoming a pussycat; I really appreciate the way it doesn't 
chide you - it politely suggests a course of action to 'try' and which actually 
WORKS. 
I've always liked cars and motorbikes that seem to be 'on my side' and don't 
try to catch me out. 
Linux seems to be firmly on my side.

Tony Wood
  (Netbook) 


On 08/04/12 12:35, Ally Biggs wrote: 

I agree with Stuart I have had a lot of experiences of Linux users slating 
windows or calling it windozes and stupid names, And you are right it does make 
people unwelcome. Linux and windows both bring something unique to the table 
both have there pros and cons. linux for the server side and windows for the 
home. Linux will never be as big as windows for home use you only have to look 
at microsofts market share to see this. and hey if learning about Microsoft 
enables me to better my wages then so be it I will continue to learn and 
support both I wish people would not be so anal about linux yes it is more 
stable and yes it can be run on a variety of different hardware yes it can be a 
pain in the ass making the transition from windows to Nix, and it doesn't help 
when the majority of Linux communities are full of god like beings who expect 
you to be some kind of terminal / programming guru, Sometimes I don't want to 
spend days reading outdated documentation and guides on how to set up
a domain controller why waste all that time when I can click one button in ms 
products. sure I've setup a dc the open source way but by the time a newbie 
like myself did it Microsoft would of broke that version of samba lol Sent from 
my iPhone On 8 Apr 2012, at 11:19, "Stuart Sears" <stu...@sjsears.com> wrote: 

On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 13:44:42 +0100, Bryn Jones wrote: [snip, hopefully without 
attribution errors] 

Also would M$ Windoze be more acceptable? 

No, not really. It looks and sounds childish to me. Constant references to 
Microsoft and Windows like this (which often appear in publicly searchable 
archives) just put non-Linux users off and make the Linux community look like a 
bunch of childish nerds. The more I work with both technologies, the more it 
seems these attitudes cause windows-centric people who have expressed an 
interest in open source and Linux to feel unwelcome. They just cause enmity and 
do "the cause" (if there is one) more harm than good. If you want to encourage 
people to investigate Linux and open source as viable alternatives to their 
current systems it's important to not treat them like idiots or make them feel 
picked-on in some way. Just my 2p-worth. Don't take it personally, it's not 
intended that way. 

(hey I used to work on Windows solely and would have happily told people to 
just buy SBS and get on with it. I learned too much working in M$ dev houses to 
ever recommend it as a 1st option). 

"not recommending" is not the same as "calling silly names" :) Just sayin'. 
Stuart -- Stuart Sears RHCA etc. "It's today!" said Piglet. "My favourite day," 
said Pooh. -- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web Interface: 
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire LUG URL: 
http://www.hantslug.org.uk 
-------------------------------------------------------------- 

-- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web Interface: 
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire LUG URL: 
http://www.hantslug.org.uk 
-------------------------------------------------------------- 



-- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web Interface: 
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire LUG URL: 
http://www.hantslug.org.uk 
-------------------------------------------------------------- 


-- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web Interface: 
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire LUG URL: 
http://www.hantslug.org.uk 
-------------------------------------------------------------- 

--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------

--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to