Enrico Migliore wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Enrico Migliore wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
The GNU/Classpath guys, for example, have defined a standard
interface to underlying OS
and that's it. Therefore I don't think we really need the APR layer.
Well, perhaps some day, someone will just 'brake' and
instead of loosing hair decide simply to build a better
thing then GNU/Classpath is.
The only reason why it's still there is because no one
wrote something different, but the same thing applies
to the JVM thought.
Regards,
Mladen.
I wouldn't mind at all using a rock solid library like APR between the
JVM and the OS.
The only problem I see here is: "performance, in terms of execution speed".
early optimization is the root to all evil, and I think it clearly
applies here.
--
Stefano.
