JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es> wrote:
> Hi James,
> I included HNCP in RFC7084-bis following your request :-(
Where is the document being revised?
RFC7084 turns out to be a document which is both requirements on CE routers,
but also implicitely requirements on ISPs to provide things to compliant CE
routers.
I would like to have either both explicitely in an RFC7084bis, or have two
documents.
I'd sure like to get some of our (HOMENET) DNS forward/reverse requirements
into the
RFC7084bis-ISP-requirements.
> So, concentrating in homenet.
> Do, repeating my 2nd questions, do we believe we need a specific
> document HOMENET document to suggest to include in CE, or to say how to
> do it, or whatever?
I'm just not parsing this question, btw.
> Now, the questions I’ve for this WG is:
> 1) Do you think I should mention other homenet documents ? 2) Do
> you think we should have a specific homenet document requiring the
> support of homenet for IPv6 CE routers, so for example this becomes an
> integral part of testing by ISPs, IPv6 Ready Logo, or even RFQs, etc.?
> I will be happy to work in a homenet document if we believe that 2
> above is needed. Anyone else interested?
I think that we need some additional text in 7084bis that permits a
7084bis-only device to not screw up a HOMENET network. I don't have specific
examples at the moment, but I recall we had various discussions in the past
about how things might work or fail to work.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
