james woodyatt <j...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...] and also what may or may not be good to include in requirements
>> specifically targeting routers at the customer's edge (CE).
> I think it's a waste of time for HOMENET to propose requirements for
> routers in service provider networks, event those at the edge that
> connects to subscribers. Those requirements will be neither welcome nor
> observed by the industry.
I think it's appropriate for HOMENET to review and comment on a document in
v6ops that doing that. Do you agree?
I'd like a 7084bis document to focus less on requirements for the CE
*router*, and more on what shapes of bits we need to pass between CE and ISP.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
