I am so impressed your insight!  Please forgive me for off-line of the
topic.

Although I don't have stats in my hands, I can explain two things for
your understanding how they got over an economic crisis. 
Way back to mid of 1990s the economic crisis in S Korea was almost same
or bigger than last years in US, and it was controlled by IMF.
I experienced a big jump on the commodity price, especially 5 times
increase over the night for the  flour and toilet paper which had never
experienced since I was born in.  That's why I came over here for a
better quality of toilet paper with batter price.

First thing government tried to do was campaigning in order for them to
turn around an economic crisis;
- asking the nation to come out them with Gold from their draw or safe.
 
At that time I also sold my wedding & my children's baby-shower rings to
government, in a result world gold market was fluctuated, and gold price
was downward.

- Secondly Government tried to let people sign on an application for the
credit cards as many as possible in order to stimulate a financial
infrastructure.  

At that time my high school nephew had dozen cards, and still using it.

Eventually prevailing credit cards worked, and would be able to get over
an economic crisis, although they have a social crisis by over-spending
as fallout.

That's why they need extra wallet for more cards.

Sometime economists also don't understand how Korean economy works.

One thing I know is they are really superb at campaigning!

 

  

 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Sam Siegel
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 11:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Korean bank Moves back to Mainframes (...no, not back)

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Ted MacNEIL <eamacn...@yahoo.ca> wrote:

> >That's the point of (EMV) "chip" cards.  >They are inherently more
secure.
>
> Why are they more secure?
> INTERAC Canada has been telling us that they are.
> So far, on their web-site, the proof presented has been: "They are
more
> secure".
>
> When they sent me my new chip card, through the bank I use, nothing
had
> changed.
> They even kept the same PIN, which is supposed to be a secret.
>
> Except for a different slot in the debit machine, the process for
payment
> is the same.
>
> Where is the 'enhanced' security?
> What makes it so?
>
> I honestly don't know if this is off-topic, because debit cards, in
Canada,
> are still processed on mainframes, for the Big Five, at least.
>
> And, the mainframe, if you aren't stupid, is still the most secure
> processing environment, chip cards aside.
>
> (Yes! My bias is showing.)
> -
> Too busy driving to stop for gas!
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>


I'm not trying to be argumentative here, but some of the number still
don't
just add up.

On a global basis the largest card processor in the world clears and
settles
about 10 billion USD on 250 to 300 million transactions per day..  Or
about
40 USD per transaction.  Assuming that the average in S. Korea
transaction
is 5 USD.  Then 200 million per day is a billion USD per day cleared and
settled.  This is over 360 billion USD per year.  The S. Korean economy
is
1.3 Trillion USD (2008) according to the CIA fact book.  That would mean
that 28% of the S. Korean economy is handled via Credit Card
transactions.
 This is more than 5 times the rate of the rest of the world.


If an average transaction rate of 20 USD was used it would be even more
extreme.  If a lower average transaction value was used, then fees and
charges would be a large portions of the profits that merchant would be
giving up.

Something does not balance.


That would

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


The information transmitted is intended only for the addressee and may contain 
confidential, proprietary and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, 
distribution or other use of or the taking of any action in reliance upon this 
information is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact the 
sender and delete or destroy this message and any copies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to