Dave I've repeated an example of why it matters to Don Grinsell.
I thought it might be interesting to dig out another case. In fact, I see now it's the same person still bemused by hearing the misuse so often and getting confused in a way other than that other example: <quote> I have the following entry in my USSTAB: P39TMMVS USSCMD CMD=P39TMMVS,REP=LOGON,FORMAT=BAL USSPARM PARM=APPLID,DEFAULT=TMONMVS When I key in P39TMMVS we are really getting TMONMVS as the executable. What I don't understand is what path is followed to execute TMONMVS? </quote> http://alabamamaps.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0902&L=ibm- main&T=0&F=&S=&P=53610 Chris Mason On Mon, 2 May 2011 16:51:44 -0700, Gibney, Dave <gib...@wsu.edu> wrote: >Amen, can you say AAAMeennn > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On >> Behalf Of Scott Rowe >> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 2:42 PM >> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu >> Subject: Re: USS vs USS >> >> Ed, >> >> That has to be the most sensible post of this entire idiotic >kerfuffle. >> >> I owe you a beer if I ever make it to SCIDS again. >> >> Scott >> >> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Edward Jaffe >> <edja...@phoenixsoftware.com>wrote: >> >> > On 5/2/2011 8:44 AM, Ed Gould wrote: >> > >> >> I suggest a SHARE requirement to get IBM to decide once and for all >> of a >> >> definition for USS. >> >> >> > >> > I would like to know which use is the most offensive to the largest >> number >> > of people. That's the one I will start using most. >> > >> > -- >> > Edward E Jaffe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html