2011.09.04 12:13 Reindl Harald rašė: > > > Am 04.09.2011 06:37, schrieb Stas Malyshev: >> Hi! >> >> On 9/2/11 6:51 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >>> Forget the failed tests. A new PHP release is about improving the >>> ecosystem. If the folks that maintain libmysql and mysqlnd suggest that >>> mysqlnd is more robust and it is the path forward, why would we resist >>> this? Do we not trust Oracle/MySQL enough to listen to their input? >> >> Because of the little thing called BC? > > what the hell are you speaking about?
A little thing called backwards compatibility. If you change the way extension behaves and some application depends on that kind of behavior, it will break that application. >> Right now I have at least two tests suggesting mysqlnd has different >> semantics than libmysql, > > so why are these not reported upstream 1 year ago and fixed? Since when third party implementation can impose own standards on primary library implementation? Different semantics is not a bug for libmysql. -- Tomas -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
