In your letter dated Mon, 30 May 2011 12:47:19 +0200 you wrote: >Then a node has both, a SLAAC address and a DHCPv6 address. Where is the probl >em? The only problem I can think of is the issue I was trying to discuss here >a couple of weeks ago: An address collision between SLAAC addresses and non-SL >AAC addresses. Normal SLAAC should never collide with DHCP, since the 'u' bit >is always 1 for a SLAAC address (globally unique) but should be '0' for a DHCP > address (not globally unique). Only SLAAC with Privacy Extension could collid >e with DHCP (since it also has a 'u' bit of 0) and I was told on this list "Do >n't worry, the address space is so huge, this is probably never going to happe >n".
If you are really worried about this, then I guess you can also just assign two prefixes to a single link and use one for SLAAC and the other for DHCPv6. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
