On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 14:45, Phil <p...@haigh-family.com> wrote: > [...] that the companies I worked for would > not invest in their employees because usually there was no immediate > benefit but there was a cost, and the discussion stopped there. Sorry, > bit of a thread hijack.
Especially in crisis companies run for the quick money. But that strikes back. When companies search for an employee who sit in a cage and work for a banana, they should not wonder if all they find is an ape. Maybe we are getting slightly off-topic but the point is that such policies are invented and implemented with the appropriate state of mind. And I think there is a huge difference between encrypting harddrives or sticks and prohibiting IM and other stuff. The first makes sense, the latter not. > Personally I think there is a good case for having different network > zones with different levels of lockdown - trusted senior developers > could have more unfettered access than new juniors, I would differ between different level of user know-how and not by position. But the problem there is: How to measure? - Could be a short test sufficient? -- Martin Wildam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
