Hi Darryl and all:
Maybe we don't realize how much this new version has added in functionality, and
you or someone else should clarify all the benefits.
Once this is done, we may feel better about forking out our hard earned cash.
Until then I remain suspect about this release...
"Darrell Shandrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/11/99 12:43:36 PM
Please respond to "Darrell Shandrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: (bcc: Karim Lakhani)
Subject: Re: SMA's and HJ's flagrant lies!
Hi,
Yes. I think many of us can agree that H-J's policies are somewhat regressive,
but, hey, what's up with all the anger towards your
comrads? I think we're really on the same page, here. All upgrades have their
positive and negative aspects. Overall, JFW 3.3 is
a huge improvement that is not "full of bugs". I am very satisfied with this
release.
Regards.
On Tue, 11 May 1999 11:29:38 -0700, David R. Sherman wrote:
>Hi Doug,
>
>I wrote the initial post. Like you, I normally sit back quietly and just
>read the posts.
>
>If you had read my post carefully you would have noticed that I never
>bashed HJ for releasing an upgrade too slowly. In fact, my post posed
>the question of why the sudden rush to release version 3.3 so fast.
>
>What upsets me is that I just paid $300 for an upgrade to version 3.20.19
>in late January. I also paid $100 for an SMA, which entitles me to two
>free upgrades.
>
>I am annoyed that one of those upgrades is being released just over
>three months after I paid for the SMA. And from what I've read on this
>list, the current version IS NOT ready for final release. But alas, HJ
>has already sent this version off to the press. It sounds as though JFW
>3.3 needed quite a bit more testing before its final release. I am
>perfectly happy with version 3.2, and don't plan on installing an upgrade
>which is full of bugs.
>
>So, excuse me if I am angry for being "taken to the cleaners".
>
>BTW - I am a programmer also -- for what that is worth.
>
>Sorry you can't handle the truth,
>
>Dave Sherman
>
>
>On Tue, 11 May 1999 10:13:47 -0500 (CDT) Doug Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>In response to Jim's "soap box" on not bashing companies for
>>producing
>>software too slowly, then imperfectly: I AM a programmer (at least I
>>was
>>professionally before I became a teacher, and still am at heart
>>sometimes
>>:-) ), and I know this one from both sides. I listen appreciatively
>>on
>>this list to bug reports, praises and criticisms of the product and
>>its
>>updates, improvement requests and sometimes donations, etc.; but I,
>>too,
>>don't like the before-and-after attacks on HJ's slowness to release,
>>then
>>failure to test. It's a pattern known all over in the business
>>though.
>>Lots of people are impatient; lots are intolerant of mistakes; some
>>are
>>both. Which am I? Well, I don't know, but I don't want to wait for
>>an
>>answer and don't want any wrong ones posted on this list. <major
>>grin>
>>
>>--
>>Doug Lee, Computer Instructor
>
>___________________________________________________________________
>You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
>Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
>or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
