> His scope was TOO BIG from > the beginning and certainly doesn't need widening! +1 (That's why I want to get my favorites near the top. <grin>)
> I advocate that > we stick with the original idea (maybe even cut it down to 3 or 4) > and save the EJB stuff for sometime later (maybe the following month). +1 EJB is a vast topic. Perhaps after a good rundown on the containerless persistence frameworks, we can form a generic picture of how they work. Then the EJB 2.x can be presented and finally an educated comparison pro/con? Cheers, Tim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
