moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>
>
> HI Mac,
>
> I agree. It was HER attorney who approached the publisher about a book
> deal that would be an autobiography and WOULD INCLUDE HER ACCOUNT OF
> CLINTON'S SEXUAL ADVANCES. Now, how much interest do you think there
> would be in a book that did not include that or that told how Clinton
> always behaved like a gentleman? Would the fact that she is in debt
> motivate her to lie or exaggerate to hype the book? Her lawyer even made
> the comment that the 60 Minutes appearance would help sell the book.
> This is sufficient to destroy her credibility in many people's minds.
>
> Bill
>
Afternoon Bill,
The part about the sexual advances was not part of the original proposal.
that surfaced after they were told that there wasn't enough for more than a chapter.
As the negotiations went on the story changed.
IMO, Ms. Willey is damaged goods and the chance of her testifying are nill and the
chances of any trial is slim.
...Mac
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
