Am Donnerstag, 27. Februar 2020 15:46:04 UTC+1 schrieb Thomas Passin: But in general you are not wrong here. Leo Editor can be used that way, >> even though it's not be the best for this. But it's not the worst either. >> It depends on how you polish it and yourself. Using Leo in a way to copy >> Luhmanns Zettelkasten could be done with 2-3 Simple functions. All you need >> is something to get the reference of node, and something to got from a link >> in text to the referenced node. First one is quite simple, just add an >> entry to the context-menu to get the leo-internal id. Second one could be >> achived by reusing the existing Hyperlink-Click-function and add support >> for links with leo:// as protocol. Then the rest is up to you to use it and >> fill your box. >> > > Just so. That's what I have worked out in some of the posts on this > thread; a small example, with working code for the three functions, is > attached to my Feb 25 post on the thread "Comments re the ZettelKasten > work". The idea is to have something as minimal and non-obtrusive as > possible, yet still be useful. > > Yes, that's also a way to do it. But I was talking more about a way to insert links in text, and let the choose. So you can have as many links in a node as you want. After all that's some differences in Luhmanns system. But I guess this is not something that can be done in a @command or plugin. But you could build a search-interface for listing multiple links in a node and choosing a target.
But funny that we both came up with the same colon-based-syntax for embedding metadata in nodes :) BTW Using "created" instead of "timestamp" would be more self-documentating. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/e9120fb6-bd0b-4a64-a696-a319d4e490b9%40googlegroups.com.
