Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 07/14/07 12:52 CST: > It's their stable branch which contains many backported bug fixes and > they're not producing any more releases. Is it better to use a known > buggy glibc-2.5? If glibc-2.5.1 was imminent, I'd say wait, but recent > history would suggest it's not likely.
I'm just mentioning it, doesn't really matter to me. However I'm curious about something else. These branch update patches are huge, these are all "bug" fixes? There's no enhancements in these patches? I'm asking because I don't know the answer, but it would be nice to know. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.23] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 13:13:00 up 2 days, 6:20, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.03, 0.00 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
