Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 07/14/07 10:34 CST:

> I think most of the issues brought up in this thread have been
> addressed. I'd like to see if glibc-2.5.1 will happen, but we can
> certainly just use the latest branch_update patch.

Just out of curiosity, why are we continually updating the Glibc
patch?  After this branch_update 3 patch, Glibc probably isn't even
close to a "stable" release any more. Doesn't this sort of go against
a long-standing policy?

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.23] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
12:08:01 up 2 days, 5:15, 1 user, load average: 0.68, 0.23, 0.07
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to