Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 07/14/07 10:34 CST: > I think most of the issues brought up in this thread have been > addressed. I'd like to see if glibc-2.5.1 will happen, but we can > certainly just use the latest branch_update patch.
Just out of curiosity, why are we continually updating the Glibc patch? After this branch_update 3 patch, Glibc probably isn't even close to a "stable" release any more. Doesn't this sort of go against a long-standing policy? -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.23] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 12:08:01 up 2 days, 5:15, 1 user, load average: 0.68, 0.23, 0.07 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page