Thank goodness we have some really smart people paying attention. These are
all facts.

I'm a bit dismayed at the contradictions within one's own post on this
topic. I see the townspeople looking for more options to comply to HCA,
back most everything with fact.

Kind Regards,

Scott Clary
617-968-5769

Sent from a mobile device - please excuse typos and errors

On Sun, Nov 12, 2023, 11:05 AM Karla Gravis <karlagra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I thought the premise of locating 100% of rezoned units around the train
> station and giving away our town meeting negotiating power was to "support
> and maintain our small commercial center" and "promote decarbonization
> and climate change adaptation by rezoning near transportation and
> amenities.
>
> But we are now being told that the plans for the mall will reduce
> commercial space and that we may not even be able to keep Donelan's. So why
> do we insist on putting all rezoned housing into the same spot where there
> are likely to be fewer amenities in the future? The train schedule is
> limited and unreliable enough that it is naive to think people will take
> the train to do a grocery run. It sounds like a situation where the cure is
> worse than the disease.
>
> *It is not true that much of the study was conducted at noon on a public
> holiday.* The consulting team conducted field studies across 8 days, none
> of which were public holidays. (April 12, 13, 16, 17, 24, 27, and 29, and
> May 8, 2013. Page 25 of the study).
>
>
> https://www.lincolntown.org/DocumentCenter/View/65765/Lincoln-Station-Planning-Study-3-27-2014bwfinal
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 11:02 AM melinda bruno-smith <
> melindabr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I too thought the town was interested in developing or at least
>> maintaining its commercial center.
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> Melinda Bruno-Smith
>>
>> On Nov 12, 2023, at 10:44 AM, Margaret Olson <s...@margaretolson.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> We have no guarantees that the RLF will maintain Donelan's either. If
>> Donelan's is not sufficiently profitable they will leave, and the RLF may
>> or may not be willing and able to set their rent at a level that keeps them
>> profitable.
>>
>> A note on the 2014 study: much of the research on the impact of the train
>> was conducted at noon on a public holiday.
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 10:07 AM Karla Gravis <karlagra...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I want to emphasize that the Mall is currently a profitable concern.The
>>> RLF disclosed a rental profit of $164,571 in 2022. Details here
>>> <https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/46132391/202341749349301024/full>.
>>> However, if we rezone it by right, Civico would get to decide what
>>> mix of commercial and residential to build. As a private enterprise, they
>>> will choose to build whatever leads to the highest profits, which we know
>>> is residential. Ms. Barnes mentioned that commercial space will be
>>> reduced during the forum on Wednesday. We have no guarantees that
>>> Civico would maintain Donelan's or any of the existing commercial space. 
>>> This
>>> outcome would be at odds with our goal of supporting our commercial center
>>> and reducing the town's carbon footprint. This is one of the reasons why it
>>> is so important that the Mall redevelopment goes through Town Meeting.
>>>
>>> It is also important to puncture the myth that building units at Lincoln
>>> Station would do much to boost the commercial prospects of the area:
>>>
>>>    - The Planning Board released a Lincoln Station Planning Study in
>>>    2014. The study concluded that each 100 units added would only support
>>>    2,500 sq ft of space. For reference, Donelan's footprint is 20,387 sq ft.
>>>    Study  here
>>>    
>>> <https://www.lincolntown.org/DocumentCenter/View/65765/Lincoln-Station-Planning-Study-3-27-2014bwfinal>
>>>    - 2,500 sq ft of commercial space per 100 units is probably a very
>>>    optimistic number. The Study assumed that the leakage (% of convenience
>>>    buys by residents that happen outside of Lincoln Station) would come down
>>>    from 80% to 50%. If we use the actual 80% leakage, those 100 units would
>>>    only support 1,000 sq ft of space.
>>>    - In all likelihood the leakage is actually higher than 80% today
>>>    given the increased penetration of online sales in the nine years 
>>> elapsed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: DJCP <djcp0...@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 08:14
>>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Housing Choice Act and Exclusionary Zoning
>>>> Report-the HAC will make us even more exclusive.
>>>> To: Listserv Listserv <lincoln@lincolntalk.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The best way to make sure commercial stays commercial is to make the
>>>> businesses viable and the best way to do that is to make sure there are
>>>> people shopping there. Sorry but people from other towns are not flocking
>>>> to Lincoln to buy $10 pints of strawberries from Donelans. And I've only
>>>> been here 5 years and have noticed the string of restaurants that have
>>>> tried to fill the ONE space. Whether we make any changes there's no
>>>> guarantee these businesses will stick around. That's capitalism folks. But
>>>> we can help by AT LEAST zoning for more housing in the area.
>>>>
>>>> Diana
>>>> Giles Rd
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023, 8:08 AM Peter Buchthal <pbucht...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Along similar lines, how can the town ensure commercial space stays
>>>>> commercial as the new owners could easily decide to raise very high or not
>>>>> renew any commercial lease in order to build more luxury residential units
>>>>> by right as long as the project has unused housing units within the zoning
>>>>> allotment.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter Buchthal
>>>>> Weston Rd
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 12:27 PM David Cuetos <davidcue...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> How can the RLF guarantee that any particular commercial space will
>>>>>> remain once they sell the land to Civico? Are they planning to include
>>>>>> a requirement for a supermarket in the deed? Anything else would just be 
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> "recommendation".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 6:09 PM Margo Fisher-Martin <
>>>>>> margo.fisher.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We know that a zoning change does not “dictate” that anything be
>>>>>>> built or changed, but we also know that major changes WILL happen in
>>>>>>> Lincoln, should this pass. Do any of you remember many years ago when
>>>>>>> zoning changes were made that impacted any changes an owner could make 
>>>>>>> (as
>>>>>>> much as a bay window) without ZBA approval on pre-existing 
>>>>>>> non-conforming
>>>>>>> lots? Some people who are pushing for the re-zoning here are the same
>>>>>>> people that tried to instill the fear of “mansionisation” should we 
>>>>>>> allow
>>>>>>> any changes to homes on less than 2 acre lots. At town meeting, they 
>>>>>>> showed
>>>>>>> pictures of dense mid-rise housing from other towns to scare people into
>>>>>>> taking away the rights of the pre-existing (grandfathered) 
>>>>>>> non-conforming
>>>>>>> lot owners. Now some of these same people are advocating for providing
>>>>>>> similar dense mid-rise housing that they were adamantly opposed to. What
>>>>>>> happened to the “stewards of the land?”
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Margo Martin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:27 PM Margaret Olson <
>>>>>>> s...@margaretolson.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Michelle Barnes from the RLF can confirm, but I believe Donelan's
>>>>>>> will remain after the mall redevelopment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A reminder: zoning affects what the property owner has a right to do
>>>>>>> with their property. It does not dictate that anything be built or 
>>>>>>> changed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 4:38 PM Terri via Lincoln <
>>>>>>> lincoln@lincolntalk.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I am reading  the rezoning plans correctly.... the  Reducition
>>>>>>>> in retail includes eliminating Donelans and the  Bank.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this correct?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Theresa K
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 11:25:26 AM EST, Sara Mattes <
>>>>>>>>> samat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is the alternative for the nation area to fill it with dense
>>>>>>>>> housing, while we are told there will be reduction in retail?
>>>>>>>>> And, that housing will only reflect the wealth gap-only 10%
>>>>>>>>> affordable, and the rest, high-end?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What happened to the concept of a “vibrant commercial center?”
>>>>>>>>> What happened to a “walkable village?”
>>>>>>>>> What will everyone walk to as retail is reduced?
>>>>>>>>> Each other's units?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Let us be more creative in what we can develop.
>>>>>>>>> As Ken has suggested, we have done it in the past.
>>>>>>>>> We seem to have lost our mojo.
>>>>>>>>> Let’s get it back.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The HCA is NOT the answer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ------
>>>>>>>>> Sara Mattes
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 10, 2023, at 10:55 AM, Ken Hurd <kenh...@keha.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello LincolnTalkers,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> During the discussion on the Zoom forum hosted by the HCAWG on
>>>>>>>>> Wednesday evening, I mentioned the recently released report on the 
>>>>>>>>> history
>>>>>>>>> of exclusionary zoning in the Boston area.  And also, for those of 
>>>>>>>>> you who
>>>>>>>>> couldn’t stay to see it following the Wednesday morning forum at Town 
>>>>>>>>> Hall,
>>>>>>>>> below is the link to hear the presentation sponsored by The Boston
>>>>>>>>> Foundation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Unless we know our history, it is known that history has a
>>>>>>>>> tendency to repeat itself. With respect to objections raised to the 
>>>>>>>>> options
>>>>>>>>> offered by the Housing Choice Working Group, I do hope that current
>>>>>>>>> residents can follow the example of earlier Lincoln leaders from the 
>>>>>>>>> 1970’s
>>>>>>>>> who worked with, rather than against, the 40B mandate from the state 
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> provide more affordable housing.  That, and their efforts to preserve 
>>>>>>>>> land
>>>>>>>>> in a way that could be shared with others, made Lincoln a model 
>>>>>>>>> community
>>>>>>>>> that attracted national attention.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> With the Housing Choice Act, there is no less an opportunity to
>>>>>>>>> combine our responsibility to provide more housing in the greater 
>>>>>>>>> Boston
>>>>>>>>> region with helping to revive the ailing Lincoln Station area.  After 
>>>>>>>>> all,
>>>>>>>>> given our current manner of approving development around Lincoln 
>>>>>>>>> Station
>>>>>>>>> and the fact that there has been no interest by developers in doing 
>>>>>>>>> so for
>>>>>>>>> the past eighteen years, even with more favorable economic 
>>>>>>>>> conditions, why
>>>>>>>>> should we expect anything different other than more empty spaces 
>>>>>>>>> available
>>>>>>>>> for lease going forward?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I urge us to affirm the work of the Working Group to fulfill the
>>>>>>>>> spirit of the Housing Choice Act by supporting Option C, including the
>>>>>>>>> rezoning of the mall, to address this conundrum.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here is the link to the report:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Exclusionary by Design: An Investigation of Zoning’s Use as a Tool
>>>>>>>>> of Race, Class, and Family Exclusion in Boston’s Suburbs, 1920 to 
>>>>>>>>> Today
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.tbf.org/news-and-insights/videos/2023/november/exclusionary-by-design-20231108>
>>>>>>>>> tbf.org
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.tbf.org/news-and-insights/videos/2023/november/exclusionary-by-design-20231108>
>>>>>>>>> <tbfico.png>
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.tbf.org/news-and-insights/videos/2023/november/exclusionary-by-design-20231108>
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.tbf.org/news-and-insights/videos/2023/november/exclusionary-by-design-20231108>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Respectfully,
>>>>>>>>> Ken Hurd
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>>>>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>>>>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>>>>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>>>>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>>>>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>>>>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>>>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>>>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>> Browse the archives at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>
>>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to