On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0400 Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From an end user perspective, I've found Mozilla's junk mail > filtering > to be fantastic at determining what's junk and what's not. Much better > > than plain SpamAssassin. Although, current SpamAssassin is supposed to > > be able to do Bayesian analysis, it's not nearly as user friendly as > using Mozilla Mail. But for KMail's superiority in handling mailing > lists, I'd have moved my home e-mail to Mozilla already. > > I had found a link that described how to automate the use of > SpamAssassin's Bayesian filtering, but I haven't actually tried it > yet.<off to google "spamassasin bayesian filter> > here it is: > http://spamassassin.rediris.es/doc/sa-learn.html I've been using popfile for a while and it works great. It also uses Bayesian filtering. http://popfile.sourceforge.net/ Bill _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
