On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:04:01PM +0100, Przemo Firszt wrote: > Dnia 2012-05-17, czw o godzinie 13:57 -0400, Mike Erwin pisze: > [..] > > I've only sent images to the OLEDs on MacOS, but 4-bit 64x30 seemed to > > be ideal. When sending 8-bit grayscale (or full color) source images, > > only 16 distinct shades could be seen on the display. 64x32 images > > showed up fine, but were scaled by the driver to fit into a 64x30 > > space. This seemed like a software choice, to leave a nice 2px gap > > between icons. Sticking with 30px height would allow image/icon sets > > to be used across platforms, something I care about. > [..] > Hi, > On Intuos4 WL there is no gap so the 4 OLEDs can be treated as a 64x128 > mini display. The proof is here [1] :-D > > Keeping the gap is a good idea, but I'll be out of the main stream with > my monochrome icons.
It's not quite clear to me where you plan to keep the gap but IMO it should be left to userspace, precisely to allow images like your tux. Cheers, Peter > I'm working on a kernel patch that will allow to use PBM binary format > [2] with stripped header and fixed size 64x32, so making an icon using > gimp will be very easy. > The images used to create the Tux from the photo are here: [3] > > [1] http://firszt.eu/albums/wacom/tux_on_wacom_intuos4_wl.jpg > [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netpbm_format > [3] http://firszt.eu/wacom-icons/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
