Matt,

it was over a year ago that Andrew Williams and I tried using
LDAP for authenticating users for Local apps, and I don't remember
all the details.  We just didn't get it going, and had to
move on.

I'm confident that it can be done.  It's just a matter of pouring 
the right amount of time into the problem.

Jim.


On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Egan, Matt B. (Artco) wrote:

> > An alternative to NIS might be LDAP, but we haven't gotten
> > that to work for local apps yet.
> 
> What are the hangups with LDAP so far?
>  
> > In the past, some people have suggested just copying the
> > servers /etc/passwd file to /opt/ltsp/i386/etc, but I can
> > tell you very clearly that will NEVER be part of a
> > standard LTSP package.
> 
> I agree
>  
> > Creating a special-purpose daemon to handle this, in my
> > opinion, is just reinventing the wheel.  Use what is already
> > there, and spend your time solving other more important
> > problems.
> 
> The "need" for the special daemon was to get rid of the window that Xorfb
> has and introduce the command line options (am I right here) so I don't
> understand how you would get this to work "seamlessly" without hacking up
> the original a little bit. I see it as retreading an old wheel ;-).
>  
> > But, I also invite you to challenge me on this.  Maybe you've
> > got a better way.
> 
> Me!? A better way? No I doubt it. I'm just along for the ride.
>  
> > Jim McQuillan
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>  
> > On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Jason Bechtel wrote:
> > 
> > > Matt,
> > > 
> > > I don't think local apps should have to be enabled in order
> > > to get this to work.  They should be totally separate
> > > options with no mutual dependency or exclusivity between
> > > them.  And I think it could be easily set up to work like
> > > this...
> > > 
> > > The only thing required is a way to start and stop the
> > > x0rfbserver remotely.  This could be done by running an rsh
> > > server on all workstations.  It could also be done by
> > > creating a special-purpose daemon just for this task.  Then
> > > we could implement our own style of security measures in
> > > the controlling daemon.
> > > 
> > > Jason
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:32:41 -0500 
> > >  "Egan, Matt B. (Artco)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Would local apps have to be enabled? I'd prefer it if
> > > > not. I realize that it
> > > > needs to run on the client machine but is there a way to
> > > > work around this so
> > > > that local apps don't have to be setup just for the use
> > > > of Xorfb? That's not
> > > > a big deal I just don't have local apps setup yet so it
> > > > would be more work
> > > > (not that I'm lazy)
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________________________
> > > 
> > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- 
> > http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > > 
> > > 
> > _____________________________________________________________________
> > > Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
> > >       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
> > > For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on 
> > irc.openprojects.net
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> 

-- 


_______________________________________________________________

Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm

_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net

Reply via email to