Charles Marcus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I am very excited by the discussions for implementing shadowing capability
> using X0rfbserver in LTSP, but had one question and one comment...
> 
> Question:
> Will it be very simple to 'reverse' the concept, so that someone (the Admin,
> or someone in the 'Trainers' Group) could *push* their desktop out to multiple
> workstations (or all of them) for Training purposes?
> 
> A little 'Chat' window would come in quite handy too (for both regular
> Shadowing, and Pushing).
> 
> Comment:
> As distasteful as it sounds, my boss has asked me about the possibility of
> what I'll call 'Passive Shadowing', ie, shadowing someones workstation without
> the ability to take it over, and *without them knowing it*, so he can see what
> they are doing.
> 
> The reason for this is, we have a big problem with people spending lots of
> time 'playing' on the internet when they should be working, and the boss would
> like to be able to look in on them from time to time.
> 
> I don't like the idea much, but I do see a need for it in some cases.
> 

I see this as unethical and a violation of an individuals privacy and
dignity. I would never work for a company that had such equipment. I
do hope that such covert features never make it to mainstream open
source code.

---Venkat.

_______________________________________________________________

Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas - 
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink

_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net

Reply via email to