Interesting, because I'm the opposite. I would rather use eloquence and I would 
rather use male voices than female. I guess it all comes down to personal taste 
in the end. 

Daniel
On 3 Jul 2012, at 14:47, Missy Hoppe wrote:

> While I agree 100 percent that Eloquence is the only speech that is efficient 
> enough to actually get things done with, I've
> never been particularly fond of it. Not sure that makes sense given that I've 
> used Glen more or less exclusively for the past
> 12 years or so, but on the whole, I think Eloquence is seriously over-rated. 
> True, it's the only thing I use on the PC side,
> but that's out of necessity, not because I find it pleasant or anything. I 
> don't use the RealSpeak voices on the mac either,
> though. I even bought the acapella voices, but still find myself only using 
> Alex as a general rule. So, while I can see both
> sides of the coin on the eloquence thing, it's nothing I'd get all excited 
> about if Apple ever incorporated it. In most
> cases, Alex is responsive enough for my needs on the mac. I'd love to see a 
> female equivelent of Alex, though. Alice,
> perhaps? It's just that when it comes to those higher quality voices, I find 
> the female ones slightly easier to understand in
> most cases.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com 
> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Daniel McGee
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 9:39 AM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: what Voiceover bugs people want or are hoping will be fixed or 
> squashed in Mountain Lion?
> 
> eloquence 100% is for me. If I had this, then I wouldn't be using windows 
> anymore there's something about the voice that I
> can listen to it and I don't get tired of it. I have a hearing impairment and 
> find it is more clear understandable in words
> than these silly nuance voices. I don't want that to be offending to anyone 
> who uses the nuance real speak voices but for me,
> I just don't understand them clearly, to slow no matter how much I speed them 
> up I can't understand them when they are really
> fast anyway and lastly too slow even when I can follow them.
> Ohand caps lock gets my vote too.
> If the day comes where Apple have eloquence added to the list of VO voices, 
> will be the day where I differently upgrade my
> OS!
> 
> How do others feel about eloquence being added?
> You got me started on this one! LOL
> 
> Daniel
> On 3 Jul 2012, at 12:47, Chris Moore wrote:
> 
>> I guess that makes sense.  I suppose that is the charm of VO, it can be used 
>> in so many different ways.
>> 
>> If I am using my iMac, then I tend to use the numeric keypad., and if I am 
>> using my iOS devices I use quick nav via a
> bluetooth keyboard, and when using my Macbook I use the track pad.
>> 
>> Caps lock gets my vote too then if anyone at Apple is listening.
>> 
>> HOw about built in OCR anyone? or would anyone like to see eloquence added 
>> to the voice list too?
>> 
>> Chris
>> 
>> 
>> On 3 Jul 2012, at 12:18, Garth Humphreys wrote:
>> 
>>> I prefer not to have to take my fingers off the home keys. It is not so 
>>> much with the arrow keys that I would want to use
> the caps lock key but with the other vo commands. I can't help think that the 
> caps lock key is a complete waste of prime
> keyboard real-estate, if you know what I mean. It is much more efficient to 
> my way of thinking to just move your little
> finger to the caps lock key as compared to either removing your left or right 
> hand from it's home keys to press the current
> VO modifiers.
>>> 
>>> Garth
>>> iblindtech.com
>>> 
>>> On 03/07/2012, at 8:39 PM, Chris Moore wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Well with any luck Apple may head in this direction, as they appear to 
>>>> have got the message with iOS 6 that zoom and
> voice over at the same time would be beneficial.  If it was improved and 
> there were better contrast colour schemes, I may
> consider using it myself.  I sometimes fire up ZoomText on my work PC when 
> using JAWS to sometimes find that button within a
> web page that JAWS can't see or a dialog window that JAWS refuses to read.
>>>> 
>>>> So where would you see using the caps lock over using quick nav?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> Chris
>>>> On 3 Jul 2012, at 10:31, Garth Humphreys wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> There are a few bugs when zoomed to high levels, i.e., more than 14X or 
>>>>> so. If you have VO running and zoom set to
> follow the keyboard focus you will find that the command tab to switch 
> between apps becomes unreliable and navigating the
> menu bar with the arrow keys is also unreliable. Also I don't like the way it 
> tracks and works with reading text. I'd like
> better colour options and keyboard commands to adjust them, or at least for 
> the invert brightness keyboard command not to
> conflict with a Voice Over command. You would think that Apple would be able 
> to sort out keyboard command conflicts between
> two of their own accessibility utilities. I am sure there are work arounds 
> for some of these but a work around isn't the same
> as fixing the problem. For example the menu navigation issue I mentioned does 
> not occur if you use swipes on the trackpad
> with trackpad commander to navigate the menu. It only happens with the arrow 
> keys - strange but there you are.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If I used it regularly I would probably come across more of the issues. 
>>>>> It really doesn't seem to me that apple intended
> the two utilities to work together or at least that this was an edge case. It 
> would seem to me that they expected people to
> use either option exclusively and if so, they are probably right. Most people 
> probably do use one or the other.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'd also love to see the safari busy issue buried deep.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The addition of the ability to set the caps lock key to act as the VO 
>>>>> modifier would also be great.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Garth
>>>>> iblindtech.com
>>>>> On 03/07/2012, at 6:48 PM, Chris Moore wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> What improvements would you like fixed in particular when it comes to 
>>>>>> zoom?
>>>>>> On 3 Jul 2012, at 09:44, Garth Humphreys wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'd love to see some improvements to the way VO works with Zoom and 
>>>>>>> just some improvements to Zoom in general. I
> mostly don't use Zoom on my Mac but this only because it is so poor when 
> compared to things like ZoomText in the windows
> world. It is probably great if you don't need to use Voice Over or if you 
> only need a little enlargement but it falls
> completely short for me.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Garth
>>>>>>> iblindtech.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 03/07/2012, at 6:26 PM, Chris Moore wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Riccardo,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Actually that is what I was hinting at to be honest, as i feel the 
>>>>>>>> method of selecting text within Safari is rather
> sloppy.  You can also navigate by line within iOS, so hoped that feature 
> would come across to OS X.  Navigating by line is
> also useful when trying to read pages that have been styled into columns via 
> CSS instead of a table.  This can be done in
> JAWS quite nicely.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>> On 3 Jul 2012, at 00:11, Ricardo Walker wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I doubt you will see the reading by line with the down arrow.  That 
>>>>>>>>> would radically change the way VO navigates the
> web, and I'm not sure it would be for the better.  It would be selecting text 
> easier though.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Ricardo Walker
>>>>>>>>> rica...@appletothecore.info
>>>>>>>>> Twitter:@apple2thecore
>>>>>>>>> www.appletothecore.info
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 2, 2012, at 6:37 PM, Chris Moore <apple.geek.ch...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm I remember a while back putting a list of 15 improvements.  I 
>>>>>>>>>> can't remember them all now, so perhaps I have
> just learnt to live without them.  I did report them to Apple though as bugs 
> and feature enhancements.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The VoiceOver busy is the biggest annoyance which is caused by  the 
>>>>>>>>>> pathetic slow buffering system voice over uses.
> So I would like to see that rewritten from the ground up.  There are a few 
> random performance bugs that happen now and then
> which require me to switch voice over off then back on again.  So overall 
> performance could do with being improved.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I would also like to know what web page I am looking at when 
>>>>>>>>>> switching between tabs, being told that is an HTML
> page is not exactly helpful.  I would also like to navigate line by line just 
> by pressing the down arrow or up key.  VO still
> needs a bit of work when reporting how many HMTL  elements are on a web page, 
> some windows screen readers seem to find more
> tables and headings than VO,  especially in the buggy rotor.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I would like the ability to edit form fields in a PDF with Preview, 
>>>>>>>>>> but I believe this is coming in the next
> Mountain Lion release (according to Apple's website).
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate MIDI event editing in GarageBand, and a huge 
>>>>>>>>>> update to iWork.  There just is not enough
> accessible productive software on the Mac.  There is more to using a Mac than 
> just Skype and Mail surely?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Not sure if that bug still exists when using the real speak voices 
>>>>>>>>>> where the pitch used to shift up and down
> randomly.  I stopped using those voices as it became too annoying.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I would also like the ability to edit voice over's dictionary.  For 
>>>>>>>>>> example if you type third as in the number 3
> followed by the letters r and d, you get 3rd (three road), surely this should 
> be a third?  So I think the ability to edit
> some of VO's assumptions would be nice, or maybe VO should grow up and become 
> a tad more intelligent.  I would like more
> control over how VO reads out numbers too.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe developers should also be given the option to name what VO 
>>>>>>>>>> calls an HTML area, as something else?  For
> example when using adium the chat window is called an HTML area, am sure a 
> chat window or conversation window would be more
> meaningful.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Last but not least, I find VO a bit slow when first entering the 
>>>>>>>>>> iTunes store.  The page takes a while to render.
> Well actually visually it does not, but VO seems to think it does.  Actually 
> come to mention it when VO says something is
> busy, a sighted person can still move the mouse and perform the action they 
> require, it is just VO's buffer which is busy.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I spotted another bug today too.  When ordering a smart case for my 
>>>>>>>>>> iPad, VO was unable to read out the colour
> options.  When trying to select a colour, VO simply said "space radio button" 
> for each of the 6 colours.  The work around
> seemed to be select a colour, go back to the top of the screen and read out 
> the description to see if the default green had
> changed.  Or look in the basket and hope to god you have not selected pink.  
> I eventually performed this task via the Apple
> Store app on my iPhone which performed perfectly.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Jul 2012, at 19:16, Daniel McGee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, a while ago on this list I saw someone mention that they 
>>>>>>>>>>> would like so and so bug to be fixed in Mountain
> Lion.
>>>>>>>>>>> I would just really like to start a discussion on if there are not 
>>>>>>>>>>> many enhancements to Voiceover in the next OS,
> then what bugs would you like fixed and hope Apple has done there job with it.
>>>>>>>>>>> I'll go 1st.
>>>>>>>>>>> For me its safari. two things for me.
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Now and then when I go back a page with CMD left bracket 
>>>>>>>>>>> Voiceover doesn't announce my list of headings or
> links that I have set in VO utility.
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. continuing this previous page thing, because I don't always know 
>>>>>>>>>>> when the page is fully loaded when going back,
> I get the lovely "Voiceover Busy!" Not!
>>>>>>>>>>> This is using Lion V7.4 and Safari 5.1.7
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> So what are yours?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I hope this will become an interesting topic because I'm interested 
>>>>>>>>>>> to see what people can come up with and I'm
> sure there will be some good ones!
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> So everyone, the dance floor is yours! LOL
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to