On Feb 10, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, Paul Wallingford wrote: > >> 1) Different configurations for the web server side. How do I make this >> work with: >> - Apache / mod_perl (for production) >> - Apache /Fast CGI (for production) >> - Standard CGI (for development or servers I cannot change significantly) >> - other servers such as AOL, etc. > > Use Catalyst, Dancer, or some other framework that supports all of these > (and other) deployment modes.
Plack/PSGI supports all these deployment modes, in fact it's kind of their raison d'etre. You don't need Catalyst/Dancer for that. (In fact one of the things that bother me about Catalyst/Dancer is that they implement their own support for this instead of just relying on Plack/PSGI - in Catalyst's case this is historical, Dancer has less of an excuse other than not wanting dependencies.) > >> 6) Moose is slow. So slow, that even the Moose people address it in >> their FAQ. What can I do to speed it up? What if I can only run on a >> standard CGI server that does not have mod_perl? Is it possible to use >> Mouse instead? Will Mason2 have a conniption? Are there things I can >> do with Mason so that it will not utilize some of the slower Moose features? > > Moose doesn't have a FAQ, so I'm not sure what you're referring to. > search.cpan.org/perldoc?Moose::Manual::FAQ sure looks like one :) > > Here's some other possibilities ... > > * Nobody is using Mason 1 _or_ 2. They've all moved on to > Template::Declare, Quicksilver, and Ruby on Rails. Rails is for cool > people. Those of us still on the list are totally unhip losers. I'd rephrase that as follows: Few people are using Mason or Perl for *new* web development projects; the've all moved on to Rails and Django. At least that's what I observe from my perch in San Francisco, which admittedly has a higher than normal share of hip people and startups. Compare these pages to see what I mean: http://sfbay.craigslist.org/search/jjj/sfc?query=perl&srchType=T http://sfbay.craigslist.org/search/jjj/sfc?query=rails&srchType=T I know this is only one datapoint, but it's one that's very relevant to my life and has been moving in the wrong direction for a while. Nonetheless, I'm still hopelessly devoted to Perl and so seek out the few jobs that feature it. :) > * Mason 1 is very stable, and it has good documentation. People are happy > with it for now, and so aren't jumping to use a new templating system, > even one named Mason 2. Yes. And just so everyone understands where my expectations are at: I didn't *expect* a whole bunch of people to jump to Mason 2 any time soon (if ever). It was not that kind of mild upgrade. It's a big leap, something of an experiment, possibly a little before its time (given that Moose and especially Plack/PSGI are still maturing), more like a whole new templating system with a similar syntax than an "upgrade" as its name might suggest. I briefly thought about changing the name, but I'm too fond of this one. > * The list was a lot more active in the days when people used Mason as > their entire web framework, often paired with mod_perl. I can't > count the number of threads we've had about mod_perl issues. > Yes. Take a look at the mailing list archives during the peak - e.g. http://marc.info/?l=mason&r=1&b=200010&w=2 - and notice how many questions are not about Mason per se but rather mod_perl and Perl web development in general. I too see a lot of those same discussions in the Catalyst list now. > Nowadays, the action has moved on to other places, like the Catalyst list. > People still use Mason 1 and/or 2, but it's a much smaller part of their > development stack. This, BTW, describes me. I use Mason 1 solely for > templating on new projects. If I switch to Mason 2 that won't change. Yes, sadly Dave is one of those that believe in a separate controller layer in modules. They are all wrong, but they comprise about 90% of the Perl community so what can you do :p Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ _______________________________________________ Mason-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
