[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Eric Woudenberg wrote:
> 
> >It is my hunch (okay, I'll stick my neck out and call it a prediction)
> >that DVD-A will not make it. Reason: it does not provide a
> >sufficiently compelling difference in audio quality over CDs.
> 
> My opinion (and I have discussed this in some length here before) is that
> DVD-A with it's theoretical almost 90KHz bandwidth and 144dB dynamic range
> (at 192Ks/s 24 bit) is a complete waste of time for human listening.  The
> current CD PCM format is theoretically more than sufficient to please even
> the best human ears.  In practise, many problems present themselves but they
> can be mostly overcome by oversampling and digital filtering techniques.
> 
> Part of the problem is the fact that sampling periods (during A-D
> conversion) are not infinitely small, causing averaging that will affect the
> accuracy of subsequent D-A conversion.  Overcoming this requires better A-D
> convertors, and simply using a higher sampling rate and width (which is done
> for CD mastering anyway) does not mean that the sampling period is smaller.
> If better convertors with smaller sampling periods are developed (as they
> inevitably will be), CDs will benefit just as much as any other higher
> resolution format.
> 
> To sum it up, DVD-A will only store huge amounts of redundant information,
> and the space could much better be used to increase the playing time, or to
> add video.....now there's an interesting idea, huh???  How about ATRAC on
> DVD, for 160hrs playing time?
> 
> -cb

I agree with Colin and Eric.

May I add the sampling width is not the same as the sampling-time or
1/sampling-frequency.

Ilustration:

_|-|____|-|____|-|___
 <t>
 <--T-->

t == sampling width, the time-period on which we take the value of the imput
signal.
                   The smaller this time is, the more accurate the result!
T == sampling time or sampling period. Each T we take one sample. 

t divided by T should be very small to get a very accurate sample. A lot of AD
converters
have a t equal to T since we know the effects of this very well. This allows us
to do
some post-processing on the digital signal value's after the conversion in order
to deal
with the inaccuracies introduced in this signal due to the im-perfect AD
process!

Cheers,
Ralph -> digging deep into his Discrete Signal Processing knowledge...
-- 
=======================================================================
Ralph Smeets        Functional Verification Centre Of Competence -  CMG
Voice:  (+33) (0)4 76 58 44 46                       STMicroelectronics
Fax:    (+33) (0)4 76 58 40 11                       5, chem de la Dhuy
Mobile: (+33) (0)6 82 66 62 70                             38240 MEYLAN
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                      FRANCE
=======================================================================
"For many years, mankind lived just like the animals. And then some-    
thing happened that unleashed the powers of our imagination: We learned
to talk."
                -- Stephen Hawking, later used by Pink Floyd --
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to