Since both are available (R50 at $250, R90 at $220) is there one reason to prefer one model over the other? Beyond the R90 issue is there some reason to prefer the R900 over either the R50 or R90, aside from the LP feature? These are the only three portable player/recorder models being considered. Thanks. -jts <Arlington, TX> PS. I have an R50 x 3 years and like it. A friend is asking for advice for their first MD purchase. ----------------------------------------------------------------- To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- MD: Effects of different ATRAC versions Francisco J. Huerta
- Re: MD: Effects of different ATRAC versions Stainless Steel Rat
- Re: MD: Effects of different ATRAC versions las
- Re: MD: Effects of different ATRAC versio... Stainless Steel Rat
- Re: MD: Effects of different ATRAC ve... Francisco J. Huerta
- Re: MD: Effects of different ATRAC versio... Don Capps
- Re: MD: Effects of different ATRAC versions John Small
- Re: MD: Effects of different ATRAC versions Francisco J. Huerta
- Re: MD: Effects of different ATRAC versions las
- Re: MD: HHB PORTADISC MDP 500 John Small
- MD: Some food for thought/fuel for discussion... John Small
- MD: Some food for thought/fuel for discussion... Don Capps
- Re: MD: Some food for thought/fuel for discus... las
- Re: MD: Some food for thought/fuel for discus... David W. Tamkin
- Re: MD: Some food for thought/fuel for di... J. Coon
- Re: MD: Some food for thought/fuel fo... Don Capps
- Re: MD: Some food for thought/fuel for di... Don Capps
- Re: MD: Some food for thought/fuel fo... John Small
- Re: MD: Some food for thought/fu... Steve Corey
- Re: MD: Some food for thought/fuel fo... David W. Tamkin
- Re: MD: Some food for thought/fu... Matt Wall