Which explains why it collapsed on September 11? Mac
on 6/29/08 23:25, Peter Frederick at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sorry, missed that. > > Seven? I would suspect it was filled with asbestos and concrete > dust, had the windows blown in, the air conditions smashed, and was > generally battered around enough that it would be cheaper to replace > than refurbish. Most of the buildings in the immediate vicinity > suffered considerable damage. > > And it was the Port Authority's building. Maybe they wanted all new, > who knows? > > Peter > > On Jun 29, 2008, at 10:17 PM, Steve MacSween wrote: > >> on 6/29/08 23:13, Peter Frederick at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> The combustion of 40,000 gallons of aviation fuel, along with the >>> design of the building and the impact damage did them in. >> >> I said WTC SEVEN. >> >> It was not hit by ANYTHING. >> >> Mac >> >> >> _______________________________________ >> http://www.okiebenz.com >> For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ >> For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: >> http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com > For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ > For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
