On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 01:40:01AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Try lowering the resolution > > I'd really rather not reduce the resolution. You lose half of the temporal > information doing that.
Have you actually compared the quality of captures at decimation 2 vs. an mpeg2 created from a decimation 1 source? At d2 you'll use 1/3 the space and the quality is really still quite good. If you really still don't want to lower the resolution maybe you could encode in mpeg4? The speed is quite a bit better than mpeg2 and the quality at lower bit rates is pretty good. > But I refer back to my previous message about how much more CPU > intensive MJPEG seems to be vs. MPEG2. Also partly solved by going to d 2. You might also want to try a different codec/plugin for playback. If you've got the binary win32 codecs installed try playback with mjpeg or m3jpeg. Both seem faster than ffmpegs mjpeg decompressor. -- Ray ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
