> i do think that doug's separation of responsibilities into > classes is the right one. your widget toolkit probably > shouldn't be named Apache::HTML tho, unless it's actually > using the apache api in some fashion. one reason i was thinking Apache::HTML is so we can use ap_pool for allocations.
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Fo... Peter Haworth
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or somet... Vivek Khera
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or something sim... Drew Taylor
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or something... Vivek Khera
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or something... Gunther Birznieks
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or somet... Drew Taylor
- Re: Segfault on DBI->connect Richard L. Goerwitz
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or something similar) Doug MacEachern
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or something sim... Drew Taylor
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or something... brian moseley
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or somet... Doug MacEachern
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or something... Peter Haworth
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or somet... brian moseley
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or s... Drew Taylor
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms ... brian moseley
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Fo... Drew Taylor
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Fo... brian moseley
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Fo... Drew Taylor
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Fo... brian moseley
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Fo... Drew Taylor
- New Module (was Re: RFC: Apa... Francesc Guasch