Lori,

To me, that sounds like insufficient training in literacy. A teacher may not need to be 'on board' with the program, but they should definitely be using appropriate and research supported teaching methods for literacy. If they don't, then whose responsible for the training that they should have received to make them effective literacy teachers? I have seen this in the school system I retired from and it was a lack of training. However, that is not to say that there aren't teachers who will deliberately sabotage a schools program because it requires them to move from their comfort zone and they don't want to. I think your key phrase was 'effective teachers' and my question becomes how did they become effective teachers and the others didn't? And what needs to happen to help the other teachers become more effective in their literacy methods?


Deidra Chandler, NC
MA Early Childhood Ed
MA Reading
MultiSensory Structured Language Intervention Tutor
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ljackson" <ljack...@gwtc.net> To: "Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group" <mosaic@literacyworkshop.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] RTI


The 80% mentioned here probably refers to the RtI pyramid, in which--ideally--80% of the student population have their needs met within the regular classroom and are performing within acceptable ranges in terms of grade level expectations. To me, this implies that the first step in beginning an RtI program is to carefully examine curricular practices but it does not follow that there is necessarily a prescribed or correct single means of doing this. Like Kelly, our district feels that balanced literacy and a general pacing guide for unit study will support teachers in attaining this goal. I do see, however, a danger in my own district in seeing this approach damned and dumped because we are not seeing the kinds of results one would hope to see. As much as I am nervous about the bantying of the term fidelity, I think Kelly has hit the nail on the head. We have ample evidence to show that children in classrooms where balanced literacy practices are honored under the orchestration of effective teachers, children are making excellent progress. The issue we have to grapple with is this. How do we begin to address the issue of teachers who aren't, for lack of a better term, on board? I can say that the majority of these teachers are implementing their own brand of instruction that looks much more like traditional basal instruction than any direct instruction program I have reviewed.



Lori Jackson
District Literacy Coach and Mentor
Todd County School District
Box 87
Mission SD 5755

----- Original message -----
From: Kelly Andrews-Babcock <kandrews-babc...@killinglyschools.org>
To: Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group <mosaic@literacyworkshop.org>
Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008  6:56 AM
Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] RTI

Oh my, how scary! I'm not sure what you mean by 80% requirement for RtI, are you talking about implementing RtI up to 80%? Anyway, we were told that if you do not have a "program" that whatever your core curriculum is will be fine as long as it's being implemented with integrity and fidelity. Our core curriculum consists of guided reading, shared reading and independent reading. However it does not look the same in every classroom nor the same at each grade level. As a coach my job has become interesting in assisting grade levels to meet expectations. We also formulated some pacing guides for reading last year which has helped us stay on track. I'm not sure I'm answering your question here...
Kelly AB

On 12/16/08 5:05 PM, "Beverlee Paul" <beverleep...@gmail.com> wrote:

Help!!  I've been told that the only way a district can meet the 80%
requirement for RTI is to adopt a direct instruction program as its core
curriculum.  Please--those of you out there that still use balanced
literacy, how do you fulfill the RTI requirement?  Thanks.  BP
_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.




_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.

Reply via email to