Re: Votes are meaningless?

[Gervase Markham]

>    I'm not sure I completely understand this.  If more work is being
> done on crashers, etc. then there will end up being less (tending
> towards, hopefully, 0) of them.  The fewer number of crashers, the
> GREATER amount of time that people will have to work on non-crash
> related bugs.  Some comments on this thinking:

If we get to the wonderful position of having no crash bugs, we do not
then land a whole slew of new features, however voted for they are. We
keep the stability and work towards shipping.
 
> 2. Isn't there something wrong with the process when crashers and
> dataloss bugs aren't ALWAYS the first priority in development?  Why

No. For example, we left crashers in the old imglib for months because we
were rewriting it.

Gerv