Okay, I see someone has already set you straight on this, so please excuse me. I don't want to give you the impression that we're all aggressive here ;-) But next time, you might want to restate your assertions as questions.
Blake David Tenser wrote: > > > Blake Ross wrote: > >>> It's not a presumption. XUL. That's a _big_ effort in making Mozilla >>> skinnable. >> >> >> >> Sorry, my bad. It's total misinformation, then. XUL has nothing to do >> with skinability. > > > It hasn't? What about this quotation from the Mozilla.org /start page: > > "Is there some bug that really bothers you? As well as reporting it, > feel free to fix it as well. Fixing bugs in Mozilla is far easier than > in many other applications, because you can fix bugs (such as those in > our cross-platform front end, written in XUL, our XML-based > User-interface Language, CSS and Javascript) using only the build you > are running right now. There is no need to set up complex environments, > or compile anything." > > So XUL-based skinnable user interface has nothing to do with XUL? :) > >>> This article is actually written by a staff member of Mozilla, so >>> this is serious stuff. If you doubt people wants to customize the >>> looks of an application, you're being ignorant. >> >> >> >> Matthew Thomas (mpt) is not a staff member of Mozilla. And I say that >> if you think most people desire a different toolbar layout than the >> default, you're thinking too much like a technical user. From the >> feedback submissions I've read from Netscape 6.x, few users have >> requested toolbar reordering. > > > You seem to know less than I do about these things, Blake. mpt is the > owner of the UI Design component in Bugzilla. The proof > is right here: > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Browser > > / David >
