Blake, I'm sorry for sounding arrogant. That was certainly not my 
intentions. I guess smileys can look pretty arrogant sometimes. My 
humble apologizes.

Thanks for clearing the confusion of the term staff up too.

/ David

Blake Ross wrote:
>> So XUL-based skinnable user interface has nothing to do with XUL? :)
> 
> 
> Yes. That is what I'm saying. The interface being skinnable has nothing 
> to do with XUL, it has to do with CSS. Do you want to keep going back 
> and forth like this forever?
> 
>> You seem to know less than I do about these things, Blake. mpt is the 
>> owner of the UI Design component in Bugzilla. The proof
>> is right here:
>> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Browser
> 
> 
> First of all, he is the default assignee for that component, not the 
> module owner.  (Yeah, this is a confusing distinction. Mozilla.org is 
> working on cleaning it up, and there's an updated module owner list, but 
> I can't find the url right now...)  It is likely, furthermore, that this 
> component is going away.
> 
> Second, you said 'mozilla staff'.  Default assignees are not mozilla 
> staff.  People on mozilla.org staff are mozilla staff.
> 
> Third, your arrogance is rather overwhelming.  You show up here a few 
> days ago and you're making all kinds of claims that you seem to know 
> nothing about?
> 
> Blake
> 


Reply via email to