We consider the surveys, in addition to mailing list and hallway discussions.
A rough cut from SJC was made available during the NANOG PC call this week but should be posted soon for NANOG42. Previous survey material - http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0710/surveyresults.html http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0706/surveyresults.html http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0702/surveyresults.html http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0610/nanog38_suvey_results.html http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/surveys/ etc. Cheers, -ren On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Martin Hannigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joel spewed: > > >I think it would be remiss of the pc to not review the status of > >program elements. That would be an abrogation of the >responsibility > invested the pc by the charter. > > >Further I believe that PC review of a popular and successful >program > element would be with the goal of helping it grow. > > > Can we see the procedure that you're going to make up to do this first? > > > -M< > > _______________________________________________ > Nanog-futures mailing list > Nanog-futures@nanog.org > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures >
_______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
