On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:06 AM, Steve Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 27, 2008, at 8:51 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Ren Provo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> We consider the surveys, in addition to mailing list and hallway > >> discussions. > >> > > > > I agree with the first two, but not the last. That's the clubby part. > > I disagree with this assessment of the hallway discussions. > > One of the things I really admire about the current PC is how they > actively engage people between and after sessions to solicit feedback. > It would be a mistake to ignore this, just as it would be a mistake > to ignore any other form of input. > Steve
Let me rephrase. I'm always skeptical when I hear terms like "a lot of people told us..." or "everyone feels like" or "there's support for xyz". Who feels like that? Who supports xyz? Who told us? One PC member just put someone into "context" so I think it's fair to make sure we put the entire issue into context. I will restate it. I support the Peernig BoF. Can we now do other things like figure out how to not let marketing talks slip into the program? Best, Marty -M< _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
