On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:48:30AM -0500, Martin Hannigan wrote: > The lightning talk expansion is great. The format is "ok". I think > that we should expand the time for lightning talks to include a 10 > minute Q/A period at the end of the period instead of trying to cram > questions into the end of the 10 minute time slot. We could take > questions for all of the talks at the end period. I received questions > about my talk in the hallways that the entire group did not get the > benefit of (or the boredom in listening to) the answers.
Your talk was more than detailed and interesting enough to belong in the general session. Lightning talks shouldn't be used as an alternative to real presentations, or you suffer the consequences you mentioned above. Next time submit it for the general session, I for one would have voted for it. > We might also want to invest in a timer that moves from green/yellow/red > based on the alloted time. I noticed that some people were held to a > rock solid standard, others weren't. It's distracting when the speaker > gets verbal time warnings(not anyones fault, it just is). Time ticks are > needed, but there's a better way to do it, methinks. Wholeheartedly agreed. Even a $5 alarm clock with a big LCD on the stage would be an major improvement, it's difficult to tell how you're doing for time or if you should speed things up or slow things down when you're in the middle of a presentation. -- Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
