[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > No they aren't. Do you know any people who don't know anything about > computers, who don't WANT to know anything about computers, who just want > to surf, get email, and do processing, who run Linux? I don't. And if you I don't know any who do, but they _could_ run Linux without a problem. Of course, Netscape's kind of flaky, which doesn't help, but if people were selling preconfigured boxes to do this, Joe average user could handle Linux just as well as Win9x. Even the setup isn't necessarily that bad--Caldera, for example, has a pretty intuitive setup procedure--but it's more of a pain than using it. -- Dan Brown, KE6MKS, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (... Dan Hamilton
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Use... chris
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Use... James Schofield
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average... chris
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Jeanette Russo
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? chris
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Dan Brown
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Andy Goth
- RE: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Thomas J. Hamman
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Guillermo Belli
- RE: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Aaron deRozario
- RE: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? RICHARD FRIEDMAN
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Guillermo Belli
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Ripcrd6
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Jeanette Russo